From: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@gmail.com>, James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/3] Documentation: arm64: Document the PMU event counting threshold feature
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 11:20:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bcda96e-df9a-4342-af4e-e4485c33ff55@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAM9d7ciDq-te1DQPrMrZQC9er0pSMY24nvC-atxdRu1C6uD08A@mail.gmail.com>
On 11/21/23 03:01, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 3:26 AM James Clark <james.clark@arm.com> wrote:
>> Add documentation for the new Perf event open parameters and
>> the threshold_max capability file.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>> ---
>> Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 56 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst
>> index 1f87b57c2332..36b8111a710d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst
>> +++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/perf.rst
>> @@ -164,3 +164,59 @@ and should be used to mask the upper bits as needed.
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/arch/arm64/tests/user-events.c
>> .. _tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c:
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/lib/perf/tests/test-evsel.c
>> +
>> +Event Counting Threshold
>> +==========================================
>> +
>> +Overview
>> +--------
>> +
>> +FEAT_PMUv3_TH (Armv8.8) permits a PMU counter to increment only on
>> +events whose count meets a specified threshold condition. For example if
>> +threshold_compare is set to 2 ('Greater than or equal'), and the
>> +threshold is set to 2, then the PMU counter will now only increment by
>> +when an event would have previously incremented the PMU counter by 2 or
>> +more on a single processor cycle.
>> +
>> +To increment by 1 after passing the threshold condition instead of the
>> +number of events on that cycle, add the 'threshold_count' option to the
>> +commandline.
>> +
>> +How-to
>> +------
>> +
>> +The threshold, threshold_compare and threshold_count values can be
>> +provided per event:
>> +
>> +.. code-block:: sh
>> +
>> + perf stat -e stall_slot/threshold=2,threshold_compare=2/ \
>> + -e dtlb_walk/threshold=10,threshold_compare=3,threshold_count/
> Can you please explain this a bit more?
>
> I guess the first event counts stall_slot PMU if the event if it's
> greater than or equal to 2. And as threshold_count is not set,
> it'd count the stall_slot as is. E.g. it counts 3 when it sees 3.
Hence without 'threshold_count' being set, the other two config requests
will not have an effect, is that correct ?
>
> OTOH, dtlb_walk will count 1 if it sees an event less than 10.
> Is my understanding correct?
'Equals' and 'Greater-than-or-equal' makes sense and are intuitive. Just
wondering what will happen for 'Not-equal' and 'Less-than' - when would
the counter count in such cases ?
0: Not-equal
1: Equals
2: Greater-than-or-equal
3: Less-than
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-11-23 5:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-11-13 11:25 [PATCH v5 0/3] arm64: perf: Add support for event counting threshold James Clark
2023-11-13 11:25 ` [PATCH v5 1/3] arm64: perf: Include threshold control fields in PMEVTYPER mask James Clark
2023-11-21 10:15 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-11-22 8:44 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-11-13 11:25 ` [PATCH v5 2/3] arm64: perf: Add support for event counting threshold James Clark
2023-11-21 10:20 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-11-23 3:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-11-23 17:53 ` James Clark
2023-11-13 11:25 ` [PATCH v5 3/3] Documentation: arm64: Document the PMU event counting threshold feature James Clark
2023-11-20 21:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2023-11-21 10:33 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-11-23 15:33 ` James Clark
2023-11-23 5:50 ` Anshuman Khandual [this message]
2023-11-23 15:45 ` James Clark
2023-11-24 9:52 ` James Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bcda96e-df9a-4342-af4e-e4485c33ff55@arm.com \
--to=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=namhyung@gmail.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).