* re-ordering across FINISHED_ROUND observed
@ 2017-03-04 1:08 Milian Wolff
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Milian Wolff @ 2017-03-04 1:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: perf group
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1215 bytes --]
Hey all,
I have a perf.data file which contradicts the documentation:
> Ordering
>
> The events are not necessarily in time stamp order, as they can be
> collected in parallel on different CPUs. If the events should be
> processed in time order they need to be sorted first. It is possible
> to only do a partial sort using the FINISHED_ROUND event header (see
> below). perf record guarantees that there is no reordering over a
> FINISHED_ROUND.
I see one round finishing, the maximum sample time for that round is:
52468794009888
Then the next round finishes, and the first sample in this round has time:
52468793922208
I have the perf.data file, it's large though (431MB uncompressed). The .xz
compressed file is only ~6.2MB and can be found here:
http://milianw.de/files/perf.data.heaptrack.normal.xz
So, is the documentation wrong and there can actually be reordering over a
FINISHED_ROUND? Or is that an indication of a bug somewhere? I'm running
4.9.11-1-ARCH with perf from perf-core-for-mingo-4.11-20170220-1197-
g062f29461d1e.
Thanks
--
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts
[-- Attachment #2: smime.p7s --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 5903 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2017-03-04 1:24 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-04 1:08 re-ordering across FINISHED_ROUND observed Milian Wolff
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).