From: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: acme@ghostprotocols.net, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, paulus@samba.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] perf tools, x86: fix 32-bit compile on 64-bit system
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2011 15:38:24 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1310420304-21452-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com> (raw)
Builds for 32-bit binaries on a 64-bit host currently fail with the error:
gcc -o /tmp/perf-ppc/bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.o -c -fno-omit-frame-pointer -ggdb3 -Wall -Wextra -std=gnu99 -Werror -O6 -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wformat-y2k -Wshadow -Winit-self -Wpacked -Wredundant-decls -Wstrict-aliasing=3 -Wswitch-default -Wswitch-enum -Wno-system-headers -Wundef -Wwrite-strings -Wbad-function-cast -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wold-style-definition -Wstrict-prototypes -Wdeclaration-after-statement -m32 -fstack-protector-all -Wstack-protector -Wvolatile-register-var -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -Iutil/include -Iarch/x86/include -I/tmp/perf-ppc/ -DLIBELF_NO_MMAP -DDWARF_SUPPORT -DNO_NEWT_SUPPORT -DNO_LIBPERL -DNO_LIBPYTHON -DHAVE_CPLUS_DEMANGLE -DNO_STRLCPY -DARCH_X86_64 bench/mem-memcpy-x86-64-asm.
S
bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S: Assembler messages:
bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:29: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:34: Error: invalid instruction suffix for `movs'
bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:50: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
bench/../../../arch/x86/lib/memcpy_64.S:61: Error: bad register name `%rdi'
...
The problem is the detection of the host arch without considering passed in
flags. This change fixes 32-bit builds via:
make EXTRA_CFLAGS=-m32
and 64-bit builds still reference the memcpy_64.S.
Signed-off-by: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
---
tools/perf/Makefile | 5 ++++-
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/perf/Makefile b/tools/perf/Makefile
index 940257b..c168366 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Makefile
+++ b/tools/perf/Makefile
@@ -52,7 +52,10 @@ ifeq ($(ARCH),i386)
endif
ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
ARCH := x86
- IS_X86_64 := $(shell echo __x86_64__ | ${CC} -E -xc - | tail -n 1)
+ IS_X86_64 := 0
+ ifeq (, $(findstring m32,$(EXTRA_CFLAGS)))
+ IS_X86_64 := $(shell echo __x86_64__ | ${CC} -E -xc - | tail -n 1)
+ endif
ifeq (${IS_X86_64}, 1)
RAW_ARCH := x86_64
ARCH_CFLAGS := -DARCH_X86_64
--
1.7.6
next reply other threads:[~2011-07-11 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-11 21:38 David Ahern [this message]
2011-07-15 15:27 ` [PATCH] perf tools, x86: fix 32-bit compile on 64-bit system David Ahern
2011-07-15 15:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-07-15 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-07-21 14:30 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1310420304-21452-1-git-send-email-dsahern@gmail.com \
--to=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).