linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
To: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
	Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf kmem: Support legacy tracepoints
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2023 15:11:47 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <14dd06c2-39f8-ccb5-ce59-f3a1e45c94d0@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230108062400.250690-1-leo.yan@linaro.org>



On 08/01/2023 06:23, Leo Yan wrote:
> Commit 11e9734bcb6a ("mm/slab_common: unify NUMA and UMA version of
> tracepoints") removed tracepoints 'kmalloc_node' and
> 'kmem_cache_alloc_node', these two tracepoints have disappeared in the
> latest kernel, but we also need to consider the tool should be backward
> compatible with old kernels.
> 
> If detects the tracepoint "kmem:kmalloc_node" is existed on a system,
> this patch enables the legacy tracepoints, otherwise, it will ignore
> them for the new kernels.
> 
> Reported-by: Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>
> Fixes: 11e9734bcb6a ("mm/slab_common: unify NUMA and UMA version of tracepoints")
> Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
> ---
>  tools/perf/builtin-kmem.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kmem.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kmem.c
> index e20656c431a4..50a3df5dc18a 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-kmem.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kmem.c
> @@ -1824,6 +1824,19 @@ static int parse_line_opt(const struct option *opt __maybe_unused,
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static bool slab_legacy_tp_is_exposed(void)
> +{
> +	/*
> +	 * The tracepoints "kmem:kmalloc_node" and
> +	 * "kmem:kmem_cache_alloc_node" have been removed on the latest
> +	 * kernel, if the tracepoint "kmem:kmalloc_node" is existed it
> +	 * means the tool is running on an old kernel, we need to
> +	 * rollback to support these legacy tracepoints.
> +	 */
> +	return IS_ERR(trace_event__tp_format("kmem", "kmalloc_node")) ?
> +		false : true;
> +}
> +
>  static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>  {
>  	const char * const record_args[] = {
> @@ -1831,22 +1844,28 @@ static int __cmd_record(int argc, const char **argv)
>  	};
>  	const char * const slab_events[] = {
>  	"-e", "kmem:kmalloc",
> -	"-e", "kmem:kmalloc_node",
>  	"-e", "kmem:kfree",
>  	"-e", "kmem:kmem_cache_alloc",
> -	"-e", "kmem:kmem_cache_alloc_node",
>  	"-e", "kmem:kmem_cache_free",
>  	};
> +	const char * const slab_legacy_events[] = {
> +	"-e", "kmem:kmalloc_node",
> +	"-e", "kmem:kmem_cache_alloc_node",
> +	};

Reviewed-by: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>

This fixes the error with mem:kmalloc_node for me.

I was thinking that it might be best to add all events to the list
conditionally instead of just the legacy ones. That way, the same error
won't happen in the future. But maybe it's best to have an explicit
error again in case the breaking change was unintentional so it's fine
as it is I think.

James


  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-01-09 15:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-01-08  6:23 [PATCH 1/2] perf kmem: Support legacy tracepoints Leo Yan
2023-01-08  6:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf kmem: Support field "node" in evsel__process_alloc_event() Leo Yan
2023-01-09 15:22   ` James Clark
2023-01-09 15:11 ` James Clark [this message]
2023-01-09 15:38   ` [PATCH 1/2] perf kmem: Support legacy tracepoints Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2023-01-10  1:45     ` Leo Yan
2023-01-10  9:33       ` James Clark

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=14dd06c2-39f8-ccb5-ce59-f3a1e45c94d0@arm.com \
    --to=james.clark@arm.com \
    --cc=42.hyeyoo@gmail.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).