From: changbin.du@intel.com
To: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/fgraph: Missed irq return mark for leaf entry
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 23:48:49 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1517413729-20411-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com> (raw)
From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
The fgraph forget to print irq return mark for leaf entry. Then we can see
unbalanced irq mark in the trace. This patch fix this.
Before:
1) | SyS_write() {
1) | __fdget_pos() {
1) 0.061 us | __fget_light();
1) 0.289 us | }
1) | vfs_write() {
1) 0.049 us | rw_verify_area();
1) + 15.424 us | __vfs_write();
1) ==========> |
1) 6.003 us | smp_apic_timer_interrupt();
1) 0.055 us | __fsnotify_parent();
1) 0.073 us | fsnotify();
1) + 23.665 us | }
1) + 24.501 us | }
After:
0) | SyS_write() {
0) | __fdget_pos() {
0) 0.052 us | __fget_light();
0) 0.328 us | }
0) | vfs_write() {
0) 0.057 us | rw_verify_area();
0) | __vfs_write() {
0) ==========> |
0) 8.548 us | smp_apic_timer_interrupt();
0) <========== |
0) + 36.507 us | } /* __vfs_write */
0) 0.049 us | __fsnotify_parent();
0) 0.066 us | fsnotify();
0) + 50.064 us | }
0) + 50.952 us | }
Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
---
kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
index 23c0b0c..169b3c4 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_functions_graph.c
@@ -831,6 +831,7 @@ print_graph_entry_leaf(struct trace_iterator *iter,
struct ftrace_graph_ret *graph_ret;
struct ftrace_graph_ent *call;
unsigned long long duration;
+ int cpu = iter->cpu;
int i;
graph_ret = &ret_entry->ret;
@@ -839,7 +840,6 @@ print_graph_entry_leaf(struct trace_iterator *iter,
if (data) {
struct fgraph_cpu_data *cpu_data;
- int cpu = iter->cpu;
cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu);
@@ -869,6 +869,9 @@ print_graph_entry_leaf(struct trace_iterator *iter,
trace_seq_printf(s, "%ps();\n", (void *)call->func);
+ print_graph_irq(iter, graph_ret->func, TRACE_GRAPH_RET,
+ cpu, iter->ent->pid, flags);
+
return trace_handle_return(s);
}
--
2.7.4
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-31 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-31 15:48 changbin.du [this message]
2018-02-11 10:51 ` [PATCH] tracing/fgraph: Missed irq return mark for leaf entry Du, Changbin
2018-02-12 17:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-02-12 1:56 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1517413729-20411-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com \
--to=changbin.du@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).