From: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
To: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
Mingwei Zhang <mizhang@google.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/23] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpucap for HPMN0
Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2025 00:22:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <153b5191-c585-433e-9cf5-1ed19b9a7f5c@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250714225917.1396543-2-coltonlewis@google.com>
On 14/07/2025 23:58, Colton Lewis wrote:
> Add a capability for FEAT_HPMN0, whether MDCR_EL2.HPMN can specify 0
> counters reserved for the guest.
>
> This required changing HPMN0 to an UnsignedEnum in tools/sysreg
> because otherwise not all the appropriate macros are generated to add
> it to arm64_cpu_capabilities_arm64_features.
>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@google.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 8 ++++++++
> arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps | 1 +
> arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 6 +++---
> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index b34044e20128..f38d7b5294ec 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -548,6 +548,7 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_mmfr0[] = {
> };
>
> static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
> + ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_HPMN0_SHIFT, 4, 0),
This doesn't have to be FTR_STRICT. The kernel can deal with
differences, by skipping to use HPMN0. We anyway rely on the
system wide cap for using the feature.
Otherwise,
Acked-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> S_ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DoubleLock_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_PMSVer_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> @@ -2896,6 +2897,13 @@ static const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_features[] = {
> .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1, FGT, FGT2)
> },
> + {
> + .desc = "HPMN0",
> + .type = ARM64_CPUCAP_SYSTEM_FEATURE,
> + .capability = ARM64_HAS_HPMN0,
> + .matches = has_cpuid_feature,
> + ARM64_CPUID_FIELDS(ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, HPMN0, IMP)
> + },
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_SME
> {
> .desc = "Scalable Matrix Extension",
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> index 10effd4cff6b..5b196ba21629 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ HAS_GIC_CPUIF_SYSREGS
> HAS_GIC_PRIO_MASKING
> HAS_GIC_PRIO_RELAXED_SYNC
> HAS_HCR_NV1
> +HAS_HPMN0
> HAS_HCX
> HAS_LDAPR
> HAS_LPA2
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> index 8a8cf6874298..d29742481754 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
> @@ -1531,9 +1531,9 @@ EndEnum
> EndSysreg
>
> Sysreg ID_AA64DFR0_EL1 3 0 0 5 0
> -Enum 63:60 HPMN0
> - 0b0000 UNPREDICTABLE
> - 0b0001 DEF
> +UnsignedEnum 63:60 HPMN0
> + 0b0000 NI
> + 0b0001 IMP
> EndEnum
> UnsignedEnum 59:56 ExtTrcBuff
> 0b0000 NI
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-15 23:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-14 22:58 [PATCH v4 00/23] ARM64 PMU Partitioning Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:58 ` [PATCH v4 01/23] arm64: cpufeature: Add cpucap for HPMN0 Colton Lewis
2025-07-15 23:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose [this message]
2025-07-21 18:00 ` Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:58 ` [PATCH v4 02/23] KVM: arm64: Reorganize PMU includes Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:58 ` [PATCH v4 03/23] KVM: arm64: Reorganize PMU functions Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:58 ` [PATCH v4 04/23] perf: arm_pmuv3: Introduce method to partition the PMU Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:58 ` [PATCH v4 05/23] perf: arm_pmuv3: Generalize counter bitmasks Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 06/23] perf: arm_pmuv3: Keep out of guest counter partition Colton Lewis
2025-08-30 4:13 ` Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 07/23] KVM: arm64: Account for partitioning in kvm_pmu_get_max_counters() Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 08/23] KVM: arm64: Introduce non-UNDEF FGT control Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 09/23] KVM: arm64: Set up FGT for Partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 10/23] KVM: arm64: Writethrough trapped PMEVTYPER register Colton Lewis
2025-08-13 22:01 ` Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 11/23] KVM: arm64: Use physical PMSELR for PMXEVTYPER if partitioned Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 12/23] KVM: arm64: Writethrough trapped PMOVS register Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 13/23] KVM: arm64: Write fast path PMU register handlers Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 14/23] KVM: arm64: Setup MDCR_EL2 to handle a partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 15/23] KVM: arm64: Account for partitioning in PMCR_EL0 access Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 16/23] KVM: arm64: Context swap Partitioned PMU guest registers Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 17/23] KVM: arm64: Enforce PMU event filter at vcpu_load() Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 18/23] KVM: arm64: Extract enum debug_owner to enum vcpu_register_owner Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 19/23] KVM: arm64: Implement lazy PMU context swaps Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 20/23] perf: arm_pmuv3: Handle IRQs for Partitioned PMU guest counters Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 21/23] KVM: arm64: Inject recorded guest interrupts Colton Lewis
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 22/23] KVM: arm64: Add ioctl to partition the PMU when supported Colton Lewis
2025-07-15 17:26 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-15 21:16 ` Colton Lewis
2025-07-15 17:36 ` kernel test robot
2025-07-14 22:59 ` [PATCH v4 23/23] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add test case for partitioned PMU Colton Lewis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=153b5191-c585-433e-9cf5-1ed19b9a7f5c@arm.com \
--to=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=coltonlewis@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=mizhang@google.com \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).