From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919B6566A; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:59:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708480764; cv=none; b=lorUmgUFtdpAoeBkRA1BLGWlamUzyNp/cQkPizVlHWBpUqQUsWsmihQwjh1VPEi/yHdUee11CeYj/w4WWXVbH8QdhpIVreOog6lXU3rb3Koi2kWX1AjY0cUISf6Vt1dJcar6hVYJ9f+ovUk3Rr8bZTIjyhZAi1KHY2TCPKH6Cz4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708480764; c=relaxed/simple; bh=NLwamubHOdxN0Lj8uKc4TckyhPGFH9znJF09/t3gByk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=IM6rmYrMPjf30PfVpUYUKzXim0e+wNiBslHG7oMMBrV+efTDc5mjFyUnP19f6QMqKxHSeNlWJO1pxWEleI1dqiZ7u8uqLUX37WGaHEOu8HfZshd8YbNcuNq9Ifg6B1/vLIWXpK/wxI6x1LZCS/aCSXRuc8uVIyhDjXZL/HQKiXU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RaGYHyb4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RaGYHyb4" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7324C433C7; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:59:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708480764; bh=NLwamubHOdxN0Lj8uKc4TckyhPGFH9znJF09/t3gByk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=RaGYHyb4l+bgPYKFdVnKDbP716aWAKfQCalo5xWSEgzV7wmSjC3SvgNsUVpe5DSh1 G6+zXoXpOLqmXz1U1LneF7KB56L0M7EvjqTqfaxg5m6PETHel8ltpKhK01tnpJw512 AaHYW7Y4zUdryOXAQBZATc9BjeEwzs8919eoOKico34Gv1/O5V4HwHDQOZ2IDHdG1W ORr2x/jGn0RvBmZODyDu993CfU41nt4Kug/HIT/JlwSIzTdrO2uQ4P4uYdBIT+EZfh JIN/UD5W8RoL83f6sfb/7uQuhdVwhRZTEnoXjC3jMoz/5IpH4l1+qQavbGcKw9oD1w wtI0rlfp/oZXw== From: Namhyung Kim To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Adrian Hunter , Ian Rogers , Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1 v2] perf augmented_raw_syscalls.bpf: Move 'struct timespec64' to vmlinux.h Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:59:21 -0800 Message-ID: <170848061720.1313505.18406074637867075838.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog In-Reply-To: References: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:20:23 -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > If we instead decide to generate vmlinux.h from BTF info, it will be > there: > > $ pahole timespec64 > struct timespec64 { > time64_t tv_sec; /* 0 8 */ > long int tv_nsec; /* 8 8 */ > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, -- Namhyung Kim