From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E49D3207 for ; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:58:52 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708480733; cv=none; b=tJCrqWlbtLZn5hklLx25g306kG2B6QiSjmc9lBVk4jmyXWdkta1XvfaQm6XALEvNpvlFta8PSivMUcP35PI8eibX+6tIZv2vYj4KmYPC1cvSukNhsUyWva9uU5acvZm2yMArHgkWY+PxHvBFr1NcEYev1w+CXULRd2jk5G1z+Ss= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708480733; c=relaxed/simple; bh=xW0fQ01mst+fvg1mHKrHcLsI0nhbNPQoNwnfdkLFSI4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=BQ9TLJfreq5Wwqd2UBX6GiboXE6AjjaOCgIvHs4nZ6J+FjbqH7tdT1kd1E+xoTqKJwAX/b93DyRAxDMZMKaiBz619TX1YMOJKvYKp+ydq//6iEUWg/GEvf5nlxvu62RFBmmXTmrdW/j7871axiXG+nsyWhpd9LR9kahPlQt3cs0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=mBFwXJZO; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="mBFwXJZO" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28D3BC433F1; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 01:58:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1708480732; bh=xW0fQ01mst+fvg1mHKrHcLsI0nhbNPQoNwnfdkLFSI4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=mBFwXJZOikT1BjYRPIsqiJTLaG+vSi00vqM9oCffMM5sWrylSbpIdpiql2bcURr4T fZCIKs33dj0I0fYjWWDnZI6y9lnP3aHAXiv0SoYSf4ZniGB/Mmqf3FYU1CfRV5OjYL qXhoV++vzX3AqL/9jDaQ7dtfrdD+A7SnARqlZ9wWu9M9MAN+UZLrjk44Jvh3pT8g7w WlHGgOCdq3HiUl9BoceF8ewKcEN+vBPCtpyuzEmRLOWsmfItyD8A58oKQbwpn2B6pb jBKkFDkPVxE/Mqelw1lSXLjDHchmQWTSmQeIks0ivPGrCf+XBU6wTNubvL51bVujNm 1qvJekuvo2cCg== From: Namhyung Kim To: Michael Petlan , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@redhat.com Cc: mingo@redhat.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kjain@linux.ibm.com, irogers@google.com, acme@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Add perf testsuite into perf-test Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 17:58:49 -0800 Message-ID: <170848061720.1313505.9675212976046086736.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog In-Reply-To: <20240215110231.15385-1-mpetlan@redhat.com> References: <20240131113951.17077-1-mpetlan@redhat.com> <20240215110231.15385-1-mpetlan@redhat.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:02:24 +0100, Michael Petlan wrote: > as Arnaldo said, this is a first patchset of an effort to upstream > the external perftool-testsuite [1] and merge it into perf-test. > > The perftool-testsuite originates back to 2015, when there were no > shell-based testcases for perf. At that point, perf-test contained > rather "unit-tests" and there was a need to test perf as a tool too. > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next. Looking forward to seeing more tests! Thanks, Namhyung