From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39EB51854; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:31:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718371880; cv=none; b=bd1toGjvQKbRHEIn9eZQUa/qbmScKaoIeSrnR1nY1j7c7d8AeaQaohojgO8RBxt1uQHGVHsp6fyEg3aIMTBP0yTzd92rS2X3GaFrVQ/Demy13iJLiVvF7SallPE+5ToLMqXMi8CNAhQCX1B8AGGTkIJumhXCQNOsZRmmpOkswJI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1718371880; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XhkHg7eU0fmPQAAgNc8nWOI+aXEfsTCZvQ0c8OcUjGA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=atgGoTHGLHQxkanW7qlCSO6GZoLJ5eOf76os7E2GRWaj56bVB+P8m4SaNQWcB5Rg8nEpS0LePgxClJo8deyxdYRhpvKMgtcBK0MgasH3pSXGkDhuHpWX2739IzQuRhV1S8ZEN0VZDKhSGwBqYQN9P1OPPXus4n8SimKh4ssgT+E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=fbh9QE+b; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="fbh9QE+b" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 511E6C2BD10; Fri, 14 Jun 2024 13:31:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1718371879; bh=XhkHg7eU0fmPQAAgNc8nWOI+aXEfsTCZvQ0c8OcUjGA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=fbh9QE+bN55WIEOEv8V1EivkDvHZBYwy6N9155V93U3nz2MbMb5Dlq3O4MpETQE0D qUsKMkVfsiNJZuhrWTcP1qKjvbKL3og3sQsujO8l+xQKW03+HSUbHZC7FnhzoW5etj +Qkc3iecTcJMMBfeBQy4/9aDoWRBdrSQXh/9X79cj04yXw09jPyy/mmlTikVZd3dWI a/OdMte/DuhU04/4le9B4yT1ZD8DlkkMOFS5OwcfthS6W+PrL6fivi66npqysp/hiE bLNS7ADPMNxHUB3S+WZ6MVr6vSXCT7krtp3kRGWAhQ0rsagwZKCl5DEXEBQnlEqCAk qI3l4G1e2xiwQ== From: Namhyung Kim To: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Adrian Hunter , Kan Liang , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ian Rogers Cc: Milian Wolff Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf record: Ensure space for lost samples Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2024 06:31:16 -0700 Message-ID: <171837125174.3039059.16928717312076037768.b4-ty@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.45.2.627.g7a2c4fd464-goog In-Reply-To: <20240611050626.1223155-1-irogers@google.com> References: <20240611050626.1223155-1-irogers@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Mon, 10 Jun 2024 22:06:26 -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: > Previous allocation didn't account for sample ID written after the > lost samples event. Switch from malloc/free to a stack allocation. > > Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Arnaldo, I'll resolve the conflict when I merge perf-tools later which has the revert. Best regards, Namhyung