From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E4EF1C5799; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 22:17:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732313870; cv=none; b=Y0BNzlSNAcyx/8izA/f+jJ1dqEtRIPX/jlUYzQ9zYEucNhE6pvuqOOXsCNgvRNXHo/DUFVsFcAoXUdZuAH4KmDVrT9B5aYXiIcuTAuuAuMj/lksmQUk+Jinu51lilazfjMeriRott/rMPs4qfUKDExtuXg3cn7Y8jSuvtrKArqA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1732313870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9KLPixWlyoIEAo3UX5SmGomASPN/KNoEJb7Ng39Mcpk=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tvt9yXTpIlsq+n2+rWMI7lTKDlOJFSFlJfL+3Q+3Q4xn2pzRfgaGmUqUnuZ1Jwi9DjPhIjld5XeOKWkz+XD/I/ZXpSMyRa8PBRfOELhf4cyiQvq7RGacNYSYMjzUqCvapeLEpgN10r+fS2x8Pb7qxEFfJwoJKfIktA88vrQ4VN4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=lJRxYAVw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="lJRxYAVw" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 471A0C4CED0; Fri, 22 Nov 2024 22:17:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1732313869; bh=9KLPixWlyoIEAo3UX5SmGomASPN/KNoEJb7Ng39Mcpk=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date:From; b=lJRxYAVw8m3SjtJLm0q/kFVSERR2e/LErZyjcNecPu7prbuP69hTiWgDsDnT68uQ6 l1/NCDIaVQbUsWSB27BUHx4hrDGmg/zV5dUw7zbvdImDJWGLSkgAxEpc1X5F85u+yY i7IbwyrMbbu/zZUR6NNnfLlKAq2jO3A37HaBeueYByLfuzH7WfbIhtLgNFSJtZJcva Dhi1eMXem1v5H2jBt3TUUxUKQsACu86Zs2T00a2dzG1jBoyaLt0kpbDXmmXgcB7yfQ 5Sx1gB3xxf8RP0JAbm2ZdRcUqvYpRuLNJBnOCEc6Vu9VTTjiO3NjwJcpvJVmDr9iiW /A0wRpMjEYOYg== From: Namhyung Kim To: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, Hao Ge Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Hao Ge In-Reply-To: <20241113030537.26732-1-hao.ge@linux.dev> References: <20241113030537.26732-1-hao.ge@linux.dev> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf bpf-filter: Return -ENOMEM directly when pfi allocation fails Message-Id: <173231386925.85365.8829270554421454686.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 14:17:49 -0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Wed, 13 Nov 2024 11:05:37 +0800, Hao Ge wrote: > Directly return -ENOMEM when pfi allocation fails, > instead of performing other operations on pfi. > > Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung