Linux Perf Users
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: qmo@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	memxor@gmail.com, song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
	jolsa@kernel.org, terrelln@fb.com, dsterba@suse.com,
	nathan@kernel.org, nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com,
	morbo@google.com, justinstitt@google.com, bpf@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, james.clark@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] bpftool build: Restrict feature tests during bootstrap compilation
Date: Fri, 05 Jun 2026 21:20:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <178069442140.3922226.7204524293752393062.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260531010750.525160-1-irogers@google.com>

Hello:

This patch was applied to bpf/bpf-next.git (master)
by Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>:

On Sat, 30 May 2026 18:07:50 -0700 you wrote:
> When the perf build executes 'make -C ../bpf/bpftool bootstrap', bpftool's
> Makefile unconditionally evaluated feature checks for llvm, libcap, libbfd,
> and disassembler libraries because the bootstrap target was not exempted.
> 
> Since the bootstrap bpftool strictly compiles minimal AST parsing and C
> code generation logic without linking LLVM or disassembler libraries, these
> feature check sub-makes are completely redundant.
> 
> [...]

Here is the summary with links:
  - [v1] bpftool build: Restrict feature tests during bootstrap compilation
    https://git.kernel.org/bpf/bpf-next/c/231fc9bc27fd

You are awesome, thank you!
-- 
Deet-doot-dot, I am a bot.
https://korg.docs.kernel.org/patchwork/pwbot.html



      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-05 21:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-31  1:07 [PATCH v1] bpftool build: Restrict feature tests during bootstrap compilation Ian Rogers
2026-06-01  8:20 ` Quentin Monnet
2026-06-05 21:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=178069442140.3922226.7204524293752393062.git-patchwork-notify@kernel.org \
    --to=patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=justinstitt@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=nick.desaulniers+lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=qmo@kernel.org \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=terrelln@fb.com \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox