From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAE4E30F55B; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784310397; cv=none; b=Ta4PC5Vt5eJnpalVK5ncSOdAYkcovuS3vA0UPERI/XO0+zubgbqt3DLKXUPxWP+R96L2mnbOlEId3TtfjHpXjZhBeeKg1r/tFecJUOsZ8q4sr5OlrNdLPZdjBDYsAOjVZTxjXVYhGrT3HPty3KDyRmvfF4UvTNWtMZ6/icHG5ug= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1784310397; c=relaxed/simple; bh=O9bNFQr92taWS+CiuMAbyFjAxRkxw1NZBMF81HwlJYM=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Message-Id:Date: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=gLQSfRIEGeTrNoS1ZHUVGJmVWlGdCD/Rg5eH6euxFyvdMMjSTo0ZNxr/gsi1xhKUrfRB73ctIz2bPmaj5bxcqCnjvVbI8nIdtf8wfp/U0ga/VBuEMmP1dHFx/cQZOdlVZUAjP0nMBU3MZ1GJzUx/0WrzixpAk5xGx3R50LWr8LA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=ZIc2fQSW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ZIc2fQSW" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4C8EA1F00A3A; Fri, 17 Jul 2026 17:46:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1784310396; bh=MAVAf0fF3ZSdc01oFogmrudkte5kmwkGFQI/QVIUOCY=; h=From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:Date; b=ZIc2fQSWGu9uHqLGsLRcVqPSXJbl18GLgVUCpkgPr2XjmYtz/Gkq5q6ukGIhA5HMl sEOxmPOaHJ5UpRMR1IAollUlBu5VSFwd46B7KeLS7BOIzwBqWNs/8SH6Mx6/w8Lx+K q8MnNwN+lgu/eTdr7vdAwH7rgaA0mBimiLI90uH3KWpRyU3yLmsUaNbltI5cfZCKM7 nbJN90KIg1/T3E5e3sR3YmxahnAkafbcPtfYjMo1wjBuBdWb3UsTaCxqs77Bsjpr4c FqjWPfnHbCQWHEItDrZZZUtEWq6TxpV42UgWc/3iNGFs5trI452KRNa35R37w7lX0H CzafGrNviZi1g== From: Namhyung Kim To: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Viktor Malik Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Ian Rogers , Adrian Hunter , James Clark , Howard Chu , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, Michael Petlan In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/2] perf trace: Refactor augmented_raw_syscalls using bpf_for Message-Id: <178431039627.131573.9801415792020925328.b4-ty@kernel.org> Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 10:46:36 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: b4 0.15-dev-c04d2 On Tue, 07 Jul 2026 08:52:45 +0200, Viktor Malik wrote: > The loop for processing syscall args in augment_raw_syscalls has a > history of breaking with Clang updates. In the past, we've seen it break > (i.e. stop passing the BPF verifier) between Clang 15 and 16 and now a > similar thing happened between Clang 21 and 22. While the issue is > mitigated on the main line by a recent verifier update, it remains > broken on the 6.12 and 6.18 stable branches, effectively breaking > `perf trace`. > > [...] Applied to perf-tools-next, thanks! Best regards, Namhyung