From: TAKANO Mitsuhiro <takano32@gmail.com>
To: Hang Zhengyang <hang.zhengyang1010@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, TAKANO Mitsuhiro <takano32@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: Skip group members without fds when walking a group
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2026 02:33:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <179436443230.1969401.16257974217570748224@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261110030832.3060145-1-hang.zhengyang1010@gmail.com>
Thanks for testing this on Zen 3, and for the EBADF detail: it says the
member is being grouped against a descriptor that is not a perf event at
all, which is what the patch stops the walk from doing.
On the counting improvement you describe, I would rather not fold it into
this patch. Returning -1 from get_group_fd() for a leader that has no
perf event changes what the kernel is asked for: the members stop using
PERF_FORMAT_GROUP and start being read on their own, so on top of the
patch that stops the crash it becomes a change in how the group is
created, and it needs its own explanation and its own testing across the
PMU types that can lead a group.
Would you post it as a follow-up on top of this one? You have the
measurement I do not: the "{user_time,cycles,instructions}" case counting
on Zen 3. If you would rather have it here, say so and I will post a v2
that carries your diff with a Suggested-by, but then the changelog is
about a behaviour change rather than a segfault fix and I would want a
run of the group tests on a second host before asking anyone to take it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-11 2:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 8:56 [PATCH] perf evsel: Skip group members without fds when walking a group TAKANO Mitsuhiro
2026-10-23 9:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-23 16:24 ` TAKANO Mitsuhiro
2026-11-10 3:08 ` Hang Zhengyang
2026-11-11 2:33 ` TAKANO Mitsuhiro [this message]
2026-11-11 3:48 ` Hang Zhengyang
2026-11-11 6:16 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-11-11 10:16 ` [PATCH v2] libperf: Handle an evsel without an fd array in enable/disable TAKANO Mitsuhiro
2026-11-11 10:28 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=179436443230.1969401.16257974217570748224@gmail.com \
--to=takano32@gmail.com \
--cc=hang.zhengyang1010@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).