From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8993D3D68; Tue, 24 Sep 2024 02:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727144244; cv=none; b=VnBh61Xa1I4+NFHFASWetXBy1HANqqnlKG5TEERf4q+tQB1YKXL6Dh7pBgdiIiFxYh2VoEqtjK/QbXFfpHs3x/6odyAi8V1SvtPbyPsy4+FzHGvSKegO58myXq95ddaJzX8kc7mpqw3cNBZxOAW21LTy3YmHxUPRnE50pHmZcrE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1727144244; c=relaxed/simple; bh=A9Q7hnJsM3BUZjx0Y/8Kn9zSr7BbMf6xzZ7JNzV46JI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=igOLhuysuH1yVUs2oVzwaLQMWEiWjfJmTDMXcAxPO/evz+zIY6h4X1GhY5Ck+fHxIg5fK9JB6dkZedKe3zr04tgKLXaCNLJnbUf27jx3GITZw1uqurps+i1uOkum8i5fzOxSHPrRmihFu6++OMu/6L+iSOkiSw/r++iESbwKKqo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=c6OkBVZR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.11 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="c6OkBVZR" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1727144242; x=1758680242; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=A9Q7hnJsM3BUZjx0Y/8Kn9zSr7BbMf6xzZ7JNzV46JI=; b=c6OkBVZRj20VXxeeVMd5MMNUvILIBOp0TOdY6XdWpdYX11z7kGlTU1Nk PBVpdbcgPLStpSU4cNLrI1aWKDCny4uxKBKD/LzswP9enRFYqWDdvKDGp 8ie+/h3KIXLCPDqyxZGxPXTLHWYI5CGBW6CY+Zn/6Oo0V8pI4ItVnPIF8 XxZ8uH1A7zTE7Sk9HMJBEGxgV8SPs7x49WDBRKoWV6Jk+eBj7s+SRDnKu 7UZ8iLRXJZhzhQABmxRma7UlfCUxOQHukPINqBgP+dhKxVbgrkxEJkEmr B1q8CSPagwMKGwjtzLmBGtvSCPsyyqzWxuEyq9NrD+m+x3RbUgKcdgqCR A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: C2OzaIAMRDuzP6jNy9tHww== X-CSE-MsgGUID: dGDyrmoRTYCVW88Twu22Cg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11204"; a="36706068" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,253,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="36706068" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Sep 2024 19:17:22 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: qvXSTN78RwixqbkWGpi0Iw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 24QI5H8aTZO6rEb6t3ZREQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.10,253,1719903600"; d="scan'208";a="76034566" Received: from dapengmi-mobl1.ccr.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.124.245.128]) ([10.124.245.128]) by ORVIESA003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Sep 2024 19:17:20 -0700 Message-ID: <196706e4-e892-4e73-8ba7-1fa939d8998b@linux.intel.com> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2024 10:17:17 +0800 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [linus:master] [perf/x86/intel] 25dfc9e357: kvm-unit-tests-qemu.pmu.fail To: Oliver Sang , "Liang, Kan" Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Li Huafei , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org References: <202409201525.4877023e-oliver.sang@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US From: "Mi, Dapeng" In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 9/23/2024 12:31 PM, Oliver Sang wrote: > hi, Kan, > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 09:27:06AM -0400, Liang, Kan wrote: > >>> ... >>> PASS msr (1836 tests) >>> FAIL pmu (143 tests, 24 unexpected failures, 14 skipped) <--- >> Is there a list to show which checks are failed? > I attached a pmu.log. > > below failed which can pass on parent (v6.11-rc5) > > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-0 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-0 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-1 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-1 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: irq-1 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-2 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-2 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-3 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-3 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: irq-3 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: cntr-4 > FAIL: Intel: overflow: status-4 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-0 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-0 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-1 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-1 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: irq-1 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-2 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-2 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-3 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-3 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: irq-3 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: cntr-4 > FAIL: Intel: full-width writes: overflow: status-4 Hi Oliver, What HW platform do you see this error on? If possible, could you please apply the previously mentioned KUT/pmu patchset and check if the issue can be fixed? Thanks. Dapeng Mi > > >> Thanks, >> Kan >> >>> PASS pmu_lbr (3 tests) >>> SKIP pmu_pebs (1 tests, 1 skipped) >>> ... >>> >>> >>> >>> The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at: >>> https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240920/202409201525.4877023e-oliver.sang@intel.com >>> >>> >>>