From: "Clément Le Goffic" <legoffic.clement@gmail.com>
To: Gatien CHEVALLIER <gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Gabriel Fernandez <gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
"Clément Le Goffic" <clement.legoffic@foss.st.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/20] bus: firewall: move stm32_firewall header file in include folder
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 09:47:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <19e664da-df4c-4bc0-84ce-41e4364f10bc@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a46c8a8-1d25-410c-9fa2-267eb4040390@foss.st.com>
On 09/09/2025 14:25, Gatien CHEVALLIER wrote:
>
>
> On 9/9/25 12:12, Clément Le Goffic wrote:
>> From: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@foss.st.com>
>>
>> Other driver than rifsc and etzpc can implement firewall ops, such as
>> rcc.
>> In order for them to have access to the ops and type of this framework,
>> we need to get the `stm32_firewall.h` file in the include/ folder.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <clement.legoffic@foss.st.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Clément Le Goffic <legoffic.clement@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/bus/stm32_etzpc.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c | 3 +--
>> drivers/bus/stm32_rifsc.c | 3 +--
>> {drivers => include/linux}/bus/stm32_firewall.h | 0
>> 4 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_etzpc.c b/drivers/bus/stm32_etzpc.c
>> index 7fc0f16960be..4918a14e507e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/stm32_etzpc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/stm32_etzpc.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> #include <linux/bits.h>
>> +#include <linux/bus/stm32_firewall.h>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> @@ -16,8 +17,6 @@
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> -#include "stm32_firewall.h"
>> -
>> /*
>> * ETZPC registers
>> */
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c
>> index 2fc9761dadec..ef4988054b44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> #include <linux/bits.h>
>> +#include <linux/bus/stm32_firewall.h>
>> #include <linux/bus/stm32_firewall_device.h>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> @@ -18,8 +19,6 @@
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> -#include "stm32_firewall.h"
>> -
>> /* Corresponds to STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS + firewall ID */
>> #define STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_ARGS
>> (STM32_FIREWALL_MAX_EXTRA_ARGS + 1)
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_rifsc.c b/drivers/bus/stm32_rifsc.c
>> index 4cf1b60014b7..643ddd0a5f54 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bus/stm32_rifsc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bus/stm32_rifsc.c
>> @@ -5,6 +5,7 @@
>> #include <linux/bitfield.h>
>> #include <linux/bits.h>
>> +#include <linux/bus/stm32_firewall.h>
>> #include <linux/device.h>
>> #include <linux/err.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> @@ -16,8 +17,6 @@
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> -#include "stm32_firewall.h"
>> -
>> /*
>> * RIFSC offset register
>> */
>> diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h b/include/linux/bus/
>> stm32_firewall.h
>> similarity index 100%
>> rename from drivers/bus/stm32_firewall.h
>> rename to include/linux/bus/stm32_firewall.h
>>
Hi Gatien
> As the firewall header is moved to a dedicated firewall directory,
I don't move it to a dedicated firewall directory just to the "bus"
directory where the "stm32_firewall_device.h" header file is already
located.
> maybe it would be coherent to create the same kind of directory
> for the sources as non-buses drivers use it. I can test it on my
> side if you're willing to make the change.
Do you mean create an include/linux/bus/firewall/ directory ?
Best regards,
Clément
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-10 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-09 10:12 [PATCH v6 00/20] Introduce STM32 DDR PMU for STM32MP platforms Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 01/20] bus: firewall: move stm32_firewall header file in include folder Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 12:25 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2025-09-10 7:47 ` Clément Le Goffic [this message]
2025-09-10 8:42 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2025-09-10 9:43 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-10 9:52 ` Gatien CHEVALLIER
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 02/20] dt-bindings: stm32: stm32mp25: add `#access-controller-cells` property Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 03/20] clk: stm32mp25: add firewall grant_access ops Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 04/20] arm64: dts: st: set rcc as an access-controller Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 05/20] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR props into SDRAM props Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-10 7:54 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-10 8:31 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-10 8:41 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-10 8:52 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 06/20] dt-bindings: memory: introduce DDR4 Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 07/20] dt-bindings: memory: factorise LPDDR channel binding into SDRAM channel Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 08/20] dt-binding: memory: add DDR4 channel compatible Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 09/20] dt-bindings: memory: SDRAM channel: standardise node name Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 10/20] arm64: dts: st: add LPDDR channel to stm32mp257f-dk board Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 11/20] arm64: dts: st: add DDR channel to stm32mp257f-ev1 board Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 12/20] dt-bindings: perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM dt-bindings Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-10 7:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-10 8:33 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-10 7:57 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-09-10 8:34 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 13/20] perf: stm32: introduce DDRPERFM driver Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-10 9:26 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-11 9:56 ` Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 14/20] Documentation: perf: stm32: add ddrperfm support Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 15/20] MAINTAINERS: add myself as STM32 DDR PMU maintainer Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 16/20] ARM: dts: stm32: add ddrperfm on stm32mp131 Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 17/20] ARM: dts: stm32: add ddrperfm on stm32mp151 Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 18/20] arm64: dts: st: add ddrperfm on stm32mp251 Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 19/20] arm64: dts: st: support ddrperfm on stm32mp257f-dk Clément Le Goffic
2025-09-09 10:12 ` [PATCH v6 20/20] arm64: dts: st: support ddrperfm on stm32mp257f-ev1 Clément Le Goffic
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=19e664da-df4c-4bc0-84ce-41e4364f10bc@gmail.com \
--to=legoffic.clement@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=clement.legoffic@foss.st.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gabriel.fernandez@foss.st.com \
--cc=gatien.chevallier@foss.st.com \
--cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).