linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@intel.com>
To: "alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com"
	<alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	"dave.hansen@linux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"Hunter, Adrian" <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"irogers@google.com" <irogers@google.com>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"gustavoars@kernel.org" <gustavoars@kernel.org>,
	"kan.liang@linux.intel.com" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	"kees@kernel.org" <kees@kernel.org>,
	"mark.rutland@arm.com" <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"peterz@infradead.org" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com" <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>,
	"bp@alien8.de" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"acme@kernel.org" <acme@kernel.org>,
	"oleksandr@natalenko.name" <oleksandr@natalenko.name>,
	"jolsa@kernel.org" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
	"namhyung@kernel.org" <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: "ravi.bangoria@amd.com" <ravi.bangoria@amd.com>,
	"kprateek.nayak@amd.com" <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
	"gautham.shenoy@amd.com" <gautham.shenoy@amd.com>,
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>,
	"sandipan.das@amd.com" <sandipan.das@amd.com>,
	"ananth.narayan@amd.com" <ananth.narayan@amd.com>,
	"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 02/10] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:18:05 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2003fe3c97132e528cb738e6f81f7a3a004fbf77.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240624055907.7720-3-Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>

On Mon, 2024-06-24 at 05:58 +0000, Dhananjay Ugwekar wrote:
> After commit ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD 0x80000026
> leaf"),
> on AMD processors that support extended CPUID leaf 0x80000026, the
> topology_die_cpumask() and topology_logical_die_id() macros, no
> longer
> return the package cpumask and package id, instead they return the
> CCD
> (Core Complex Die) mask and id respectively. This leads to the
> energy-pkg
> event scope to be modified to CCD instead of package.
> 
> Replacing these macros with their package counterparts fixes the
> energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs.
> 
> However due to the difference between the scope of energy-pkg event
> for
> Intel and AMD CPUs, we have to replace these macros conditionally
> only for
> AMD CPUs.
> 
> On a 12 CCD 1 Package AMD Zen4 Genoa machine:
> 
> Before:
> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
> 0,8,16,24,32,40,48,56,64,72,80,88.
> 
> The expected cpumask here is supposed to be just "0", as it is a
> package
> scope event, only one CPU will be collecting the event for all the
> CPUs in
> the package.
> 
> After:
> $ cat /sys/devices/power/cpumask
> 0
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
> Fixes: 63edbaa48a57 ("x86/cpu/topology: Add support for the AMD
> 0x80000026 leaf")

As there is no code change compared with V1, I think you missed my
Reviewed-by tag
https://lore.kernel.org/all/e1f70a09f85dbd0ee3f32dffea37993e141269d0.camel@intel.com/

thanks,
rui

> ---
>  arch/x86/events/rapl.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> index b985ca79cf97..73be25e1f4b4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/rapl.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,10 @@ static struct perf_pmu_events_attr
> event_attr_##v = {                              \
>         .event_str      =
> str,                                                  \
>  };
>  
> +#define rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope()                                \
> +       (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD ||  \
> +        boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_HYGON)
> +
>  struct rapl_pmu {
>         raw_spinlock_t          lock;
>         int                     n_active;
> @@ -140,9 +144,21 @@ static unsigned int rapl_cntr_mask;
>  static u64 rapl_timer_ms;
>  static struct perf_msr *rapl_msrs;
>  
> +static inline unsigned int get_rapl_pmu_idx(int cpu)
> +{
> +       return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ?
> topology_logical_package_id(cpu) :
> +                                       
> topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> +}
> +
> +static inline const struct cpumask *get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(int cpu)
> +{
> +       return rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope() ? topology_core_cpumask(cpu) :
> +                                        topology_die_cpumask(cpu);
> +}
> +
>  static inline struct rapl_pmu *cpu_to_rapl_pmu(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> -       unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = topology_logical_die_id(cpu);
> +       unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
>  
>         /*
>          * The unsigned check also catches the '-1' return value for
> non
> @@ -543,6 +559,7 @@ static struct perf_msr amd_rapl_msrs[] = {
>  
>  static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> +       const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask =
> get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
>         struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
>         int target;
>  
> @@ -552,7 +569,7 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>         pmu->cpu = -1;
>         /* Find a new cpu to collect rapl events */
> -       target = cpumask_any_but(topology_die_cpumask(cpu), cpu);
> +       target = cpumask_any_but(rapl_pmu_cpumask, cpu);
>  
>         /* Migrate rapl events to the new target */
>         if (target < nr_cpu_ids) {
> @@ -565,6 +582,8 @@ static int rapl_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
>  
>  static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>  {
> +       unsigned int rapl_pmu_idx = get_rapl_pmu_idx(cpu);
> +       const struct cpumask *rapl_pmu_cpumask =
> get_rapl_pmu_cpumask(cpu);
>         struct rapl_pmu *pmu = cpu_to_rapl_pmu(cpu);
>         int target;
>  
> @@ -579,14 +598,14 @@ static int rapl_cpu_online(unsigned int cpu)
>                 pmu->timer_interval = ms_to_ktime(rapl_timer_ms);
>                 rapl_hrtimer_init(pmu);
>  
> -               rapl_pmus->pmus[topology_logical_die_id(cpu)] = pmu;
> +               rapl_pmus->pmus[rapl_pmu_idx] = pmu;
>         }
>  
>         /*
>          * Check if there is an online cpu in the package which
> collects rapl
>          * events already.
>          */
> -       target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask,
> topology_die_cpumask(cpu));
> +       target = cpumask_any_and(&rapl_cpu_mask, rapl_pmu_cpumask);
>         if (target < nr_cpu_ids)
>                 return 0;
>  
> @@ -677,6 +696,9 @@ static int __init init_rapl_pmus(void)
>  {
>         int nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages() *
> topology_max_dies_per_package();
>  
> +       if (rapl_pmu_is_pkg_scope())
> +               nr_rapl_pmu = topology_max_packages();
> +
>         rapl_pmus = kzalloc(struct_size(rapl_pmus, pmus,
> nr_rapl_pmu), GFP_KERNEL);
>         if (!rapl_pmus)
>                 return -ENOMEM;


  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-26 14:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-24  5:58 [PATCH v3 00/10] Add per-core RAPL energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  5:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] x86/topology: Introduce topology_logical_core_id() Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-26 14:14   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-24  5:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] perf/x86/rapl: Fix the energy-pkg event for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-26 14:18   ` Zhang, Rui [this message]
2024-06-26 15:34     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-01 12:59   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-02  9:39     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  5:59 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] perf/x86/rapl: Rename rapl_pmu variables Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  5:59 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] perf/x86/rapl: Make rapl_model struct global Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  5:59 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] perf/x86/rapl: Move cpumask variable to rapl_pmus struct Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-01 13:02   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-02 10:16     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  5:59 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add wrapper for online/offline functions Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  5:59 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add an argument to the cleanup and init functions Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  5:59 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] perf/x86/rapl: Modify the generic variable names to *_pkg* Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-01 13:08   ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-02  2:25     ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-02 10:20       ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-03  4:07         ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-03  6:31           ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-07-05  2:18             ` Zhang, Rui
2024-07-05  9:24               ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-07-08  1:56                 ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-24  5:59 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] perf/x86/rapl: Remove the global variable rapl_msrs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  5:59 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] perf/x86/rapl: Add per-core energy counter support for AMD CPUs Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-26 15:18   ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-26 16:37     ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-27  6:49       ` Zhang, Rui
2024-06-27 11:13         ` Dhananjay Ugwekar
2024-06-24  6:39 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] Add per-core RAPL " K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2003fe3c97132e528cb738e6f81f7a3a004fbf77.camel@intel.com \
    --to=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ananth.narayan@amd.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gautham.shenoy@amd.com \
    --cc=gustavoars@kernel.org \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleksandr@natalenko.name \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.bangoria@amd.com \
    --cc=sandipan.das@amd.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).