From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: perf-probe: issue with latest fedora kernel Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:40:51 -0200 Message-ID: <20101213164051.GK5407@ghostprotocols.net> References: <20101209153548.GA11820@ghostprotocols.net> <20101212140851.GA2343@ghostprotocols.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-gw0-f42.google.com ([74.125.83.42]:42507 "EHLO mail-gw0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754135Ab0LMQk5 (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:40:57 -0500 Received: by gwb20 with SMTP id 20so5121934gwb.1 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:40:56 -0800 (PST) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Franck Bui-Huu Cc: Francis Moreau , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Masami Hiramatsu Em Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 11:15:26PM +0100, Franck Bui-Huu escreveu: > Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo writes: > > > Em Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:30:19AM +0100, Franck Bui-Huu escreveu: > >> Looks like a standard path is missing... > >> > >> What about adding the one above since it looks like Fedora is installing > >> their debug kernel images at this place ? > > > > Can I get your signed-off-by on this one? > > > > Of course. > > [PATCH] perf-tools: add one more default search path for kernel image > > From: Franck Bui-Huu > > It looks like Fedora is using this one. Nope, this is not needed, see the rest of the discussion please. - Arnaldo