From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: perf timechart broken Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 15:37:40 -0200 Message-ID: <20110114173739.GA29318@ghostprotocols.net> References: <201101071104.37576.trenn@suse.de> <20110111114951.GA8564@ghostprotocols.net> <20110111145134.GA11968@ghostprotocols.net> <201101141749.36716.trenn@suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from casper.infradead.org ([85.118.1.10]:38267 "EHLO casper.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752019Ab1ANRiW (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:38:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201101141749.36716.trenn@suse.de> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Frederic Weisbecker , Ingo Molnar , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, LKML Em Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 05:49:36PM +0100, Thomas Renninger escreveu: > On Tuesday 11 January 2011 15:51:34 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 09:49:51AM -0200, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu: > > > Looking at it now. > > > > Can you try with this patch applied? We need a better way of specifying > > ordering of __exit and __init routines :-\ > I tested on x86/tip and it is fixed. > I explicitly reverted your fix and run into it again. > > Thanks! Thanks a lot for reporting and retesting, - Arnaldo