From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@gmx.de>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Profiling a program's runtime
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 18:47:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110204174750.GD1808@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6cqt18-1lh.ln1@burns.bruehl.pontohonk.de>
On Fri, Feb 04, 2011 at 06:41:57PM +0100, Christoph Bartoschek wrote:
> Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> >
> > If I understood you well, you make a difference between:
> >
> > - profiling only the code executed by your task
> > - profiling any code executed while your task was existing,
> > which includes what happens on other CPUs and other tasks that
> > may share the same CPU? Everything in fact?
> >
> > So for the case, you just launch:
> >
> > perf record -g my_task
> >
> > For the second case, use -a for system wide profiling while
> > your task exists:
> >
> > ./perf record -a -g my_task
>
> I am not interessted in code that is executed in other processes while my
> task exists.
>
> I want that not only the CPU time is counted that my task uses, but also the
> time my task waits.
The time your task waits, other tasks executes :-/ (including idle in the scheme)
> For example, if my task waits for network packets in a read() then the time
> should be added to the read() function. Other profilers I know would not
> count the time when the process is blocked.
What do you mean by adding time to read?
I'm very confused with what you want.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-04 17:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 14:38 Profiling a program's runtime Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 17:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-04 17:41 ` Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 17:47 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2011-02-04 18:10 ` David Ahern
2011-02-04 18:33 ` Maucci, Cyrille
2011-02-04 19:48 ` Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 19:57 ` Maucci, Cyrille
2011-02-07 20:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-04 19:51 ` Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-05 0:56 ` David Ahern
2011-02-04 19:24 ` Christoph Bartoschek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110204174750.GD1808@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=bartoschek@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).