linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Bartoschek <bartoschek@gmx.de>
To: David Ahern <daahern@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Profiling a program's runtime
Date: Fri, 4 Feb 2011 20:51:21 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201102042051.21617.bartoschek@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D4C4105.3050002@cisco.com>

Am Freitag 04 Februar 2011 schrieb David Ahern:

> You can determine time blocked on read (and other system calls) by
> acquiring all context switches:
> 
>     perf record -e cs -c 1 -a
> 
> From there you'll want to generate a time history output. To use
> unmodified perf code use the -D option to dump raw samples (perf report
> -D). You can find the process of interest and the kernel timestamp
> between schedule out events -- and the sched out event before your
> process. Together you can piece together the time you blocked on read.
> 
> Alternatively, there are add-on patches which dump the timehistory in a
> pretty print format:
> 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org/msg00049.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org/msg00047.html
> http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org/msg00048.html
> 
> 
> That output can be manipulated much easier to determine time on the
> processor and time between schedule-in events.
> 
> Not the complete picture of what I think you are looking for -- but a
> way to get the time blocked on syscall stats via perf.

Looks quite complicated to get such a profile. However I have to check it, 
when I'm back at work.

Thanks
Christoph

  parent reply	other threads:[~2011-02-04 19:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-04 14:38 Profiling a program's runtime Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 17:16 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-04 17:41   ` Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 17:47     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-04 18:10       ` David Ahern
2011-02-04 18:33         ` Maucci, Cyrille
2011-02-04 19:48           ` Christoph Bartoschek
2011-02-04 19:57             ` Maucci, Cyrille
2011-02-07 20:38               ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2011-02-04 19:51         ` Christoph Bartoschek [this message]
2011-02-05  0:56           ` David Ahern
2011-02-04 19:24       ` Christoph Bartoschek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201102042051.21617.bartoschek@gmx.de \
    --to=bartoschek@gmx.de \
    --cc=daahern@cisco.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).