From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
To: David Ahern <daahern@cisco.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
acme@ghostprotocols.net, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org,
paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] perf events: Add realtime clock event and timehist option -v2
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2011 22:55:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110221215533.GD3583@nowhere> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D62DC21.4070407@cisco.com>
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 02:41:53PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>
>
> On 02/21/11 14:37, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>
> > The goal is actually to extend perf script to handle more than just raw data.
> > So that it can handle the rest of what we can find in an event: time, ip, stacktraces...
> >
> > You've added 200 lines in perf report to add the dump support. It wouldn't
> > require more to extend perf script to do that. And the result is going to be
> > much more powerful.
> >
> > Look at struct scripting_ops::process_event().
>
> I actually have a draft of perf-script - essentially duplicating sample
> processing done in perf-report. When it got to the point of having to
> add a lot of code -- other features essentially -- just to get it to the
> point of being ready for this feature I stopped.
I don't understand why it's harder to extend print_event() rather than
perf report.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-21 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-21 21:02 [PATCH 0/4] perf events: Add realtime clock event and timehist option -v2 David Ahern
2011-02-21 21:02 ` [PATCH 1/4] perf events: Introduce realtime clock event David Ahern
2011-02-21 21:02 ` [PATCH 2/4] perf events: plumbing for PERF_SAMPLE_READ and read_format David Ahern
2011-02-21 21:02 ` [PATCH 3/4] perf events: add timehist option to record and report David Ahern
2011-02-21 21:02 ` [PATCH 4/4] perf stat: treat realtime-clock as nsec counter David Ahern
2011-02-21 21:37 ` [PATCH 0/4] perf events: Add realtime clock event and timehist option -v2 Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-21 21:41 ` David Ahern
2011-02-21 21:55 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2011-02-21 22:09 ` David Ahern
2011-02-21 22:21 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-22 1:16 ` David Ahern
2011-02-22 2:50 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-02-22 7:41 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-22 8:07 ` David Ahern
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110221215533.GD3583@nowhere \
--to=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@ghostprotocols.net \
--cc=daahern@cisco.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).