From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Frederic Weisbecker Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] perf script: change process_event prototype Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 18:07:56 +0100 Message-ID: <20110303170750.GB1807@nowhere> References: <1299086960-26964-1-git-send-email-daahern@cisco.com> <1299086960-26964-2-git-send-email-daahern@cisco.com> <20110303024003.GC1946@nowhere> <4D6FA19A.3040604@cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:56114 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758221Ab1CCRII (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 12:08:08 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D6FA19A.3040604@cisco.com> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: David Ahern Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, acme@ghostprotocols.net, mingo@elte.hu, peterz@infradead.org, paulus@samba.org, tglx@linutronix.de On Thu, Mar 03, 2011 at 07:11:38AM -0700, David Ahern wrote: > > > On 03/02/2011 07:40 PM, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > > Seems the thread is needed by any endpoints. It would be better to resolve > > it from process_sample_event and pass it to the process_event() handler. > > tracepoints yes; S/W samples no. If you want it I'll add it. Hmm, yeah that looks more sensible, the majority of users seem to need it. Thanks.