From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: perf: prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_DISABLE) has no effect Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:32:35 +0100 Message-ID: <20120129163235.GB23408@elte.hu> References: <4F22D8D9.3010108@rgmadvisors.com> <20120128120151.GA10390@elte.hu> <4F248938.5030507@rgmadvisors.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:44871 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753030Ab2A2Qcp (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jan 2012 11:32:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4F248938.5030507@rgmadvisors.com> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Andrew Steets Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Paul Mackerras , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo * Andrew Steets wrote: > On 1/28/12 6:01 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > >> prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_EVENTS_DISABLE) doesn't appear to > >> disable perf event counters. Here is a demonstration > >> program: > > > > btw., what's your usecase? > > I'm trying to profile a small section of a long-running > program. I ran into trouble using call-graph recording and I > thought this might be an alternative way of getting what I was > after. That usecase indeed makes sense. Peter, could we allow this for privileged tasks, depending on the perf_paranoia settings or such? Thanks, Ingo