From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: What do mean children of top ? Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 13:23:48 -0300 Message-ID: <20150303162348.GL5187@kernel.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:58358 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751655AbbCCQXv (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:23:51 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: TaeWoong Song Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim Em Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 02:04:47AM +0900, TaeWoong Song escreveu: > Hi, perf users >=20 > About=20 > The function perf_top_config() on builtin-top.c: > It depend on whether top.children is =E2=80=99true=E2=80=99 in perfco= nfig=20 > that whether =E2=80=98symbol_conf.cumulate_callchain=E2=80=99 is =E2=80= =99true=E2=80=99 or not. > (when =E2=80=98top' only work with =E2=80=98=E2=80=94call-graph' ) >=20 > The output of =E2=80=99top =E2=80=94call-graph fp=E2=80=99 is changed= depending on a boolean value of =E2=80=98symbol_conf.cumulate_callcha= in=E2=80=99. >=20 > Do mean children of top relationship of calling functions which are p= arents or children ?=20 > Linked-ring of invoking functions ? =20 >=20 > I wanna exactly explain the effect of =E2=80=98top.children=E2=80=99 = in perfconfig. > Can anybody tell me the different between true and false on top.child= ren ? >=20 > If anybody a bit give hints me, I=E2=80=99ll appreciate it.=20 Namhyung? - Arnaldo