From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: "Milian Wolff" <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, "Jiri Olsa" <jolsa@kernel.org>,
"Namhyung Kim" <namhyung@kernel.org>,
"Frédéric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf report: Support caller callchain order when using DWARF unwinder.
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 12:11:27 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151103151127.GM21609@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151103143207.GA6117@krava.brq.redhat.com>
Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 03:32:07PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 11:28:37AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 01:54:58PM +0100, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> > > On Tuesday, November 3, 2015 9:06:31 AM CET Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > > > I can take it, as soon as you guys agree its something I should :-)
> > >
> > > Yes, I think it's good as-is. Should I resubmit Jiris patch? Considering that
> > > he rewrote the patch, should he send it and add me as tester? How do you
> > > handle such situations in the Kernel land?
> > So, I'll fix this all up by adding a Signed-off-by: Jiri and a
> > Tested-by: Millian, which I think I can do according to the above
> > messages and past experience, but the Correct Way to do this would
> > be for Jiri to collect your Tested-by and resubmit in a separate
> > message, not as a patch added to the text of a thread.
> well, I'd rather take it then and test it.. I sent
> it out completely untested.. just to show what I meant
>
> I'll resend and add some test code
Sounds like a plan, thanks in advance,
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 15:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-04 15:16 [PATCH] perf report: Support caller callchain order when using DWARF unwinder Milian Wolff
2015-10-04 20:38 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-10-05 11:08 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-10-09 17:29 ` Milian Wolff
2015-11-02 21:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-03 7:33 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-03 12:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-03 12:54 ` Milian Wolff
2015-11-03 14:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-03 14:30 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-03 14:32 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-03 15:11 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-11-03 7:37 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-03 11:25 ` Milian Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151103151127.GM21609@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).