linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	"Kornievskaia, Olga" <Olga.Kornievskaia@netapp.com>,
	"linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: timing information with perf
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 08:31:11 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117133111.GF25870@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564AA5AE.1020303@gmail.com>

Hi -

> >>    global s, t%
> >>    probe kernel.trace("foobar_enter") {
> >>        t[tid()]=gettimeofday_us()
> >>    }
> >>    probe kernel.trace("foobar_exit") {
> >>        if (tid() in t) { s <<< gettimeofday_us() - t[tid()] }
> >>    }
> >>    probe timer.s(5),end {
> >>        printf("cumulative average us: %d\n", @avg(s))
> >>    }
> > [...]
> 
> Interesting solution. How does it scale with CPUs and tasks?

It's not a simple question, as there are several factors, but
generally fine.

systemtap compiles down to native code, so execution is very fast and
CPU consumption is not a problem (better than streaming to userspace &
processing there).

Depending on actual runtime behavior, there may be contention over the
t[] array that tracks start-time.  systemtap automagically safely
locks these for correctness.  If contention is high, trylock/timeouts
can fail and some probes will be missed.  Fail too many and the script
will self-terminate.  (See [man stap] for some of the related
configurables.)

There is no contention over the s scalar value tracks elapsed time,
since it is implicitly aggregated on a per-cpu basis.  That scales
without problem.

- FChE

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-17 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12 21:07 timing information with perf Kornievskaia, Olga
2015-11-12 21:57 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-12 22:04   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-12 23:19     ` David Ahern
2015-11-12 23:09   ` Kornievskaia, Olga
2015-11-12 23:22     ` David Ahern
2015-11-12 23:34     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-13 17:01       ` Kornievskaia, Olga
2015-11-13 19:47         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-13 21:57           ` Kornievskaia, Olga
2015-11-16 18:08 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2015-11-17  0:12   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17  0:30     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2015-11-17  1:31       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17  3:57     ` David Ahern
2015-11-17 13:31       ` Frank Ch. Eigler [this message]
2015-11-17 13:39         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-11-17 14:04           ` Frank Ch. Eigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151117133111.GF25870@redhat.com \
    --to=fche@redhat.com \
    --cc=Olga.Kornievskaia@netapp.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).