From: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ideas to measure kernel function execution time using perf
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 08:37:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160420083757.cba5cdd3038c7d82391b3b4c@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57158D19.7070307@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:42:49 +0800
Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any method to measure kernel function execution time for
> specific functions using perf?
>
> Current ftrace events can only record the timestamp when hitting the
> trace point (along with some other info).
>
> I'm OK adding new ftrace events into kernel, but even after adding such
> ftrace events, is it possible to use perf to calculate the function
> execution time?
Would you mean "perf probe"? :)
Actually, kprobes on the function entry point (on x86) automatically
use ftrace and also you can get function parameters, e.g.
# perf probe -a 'YOUR_TARGET_FUNCTION $params'
And with using ftrace, you can get function duration and parameters,
for example,
# perf probe -a 'vfs_read $params'
Added new event:
probe:vfs_read (on vfs_read with $params)
You can now use it in all perf tools, such as:
perf record -e probe:vfs_read -aR sleep 1
# cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/
# echo vfs_read > set_ftrace_filter
# echo 1 > events/probe/vfs_read/enable
# echo function_graph > current_tracer
# echo 0 > trace
# less trace
# tracer: function_graph
#
# CPU DURATION FUNCTION CALLS
# | | | | | | |
2) | /* vfs_read: (vfs_read+0x0/0x130) file=0xffff88036a959200 buf=0x7ffe460abb70 count=0x10 pos=0xffff880052d1bf20 */
3) | /* vfs_read: (vfs_read+0x0/0x130) file=0xffff88024524b900 buf=0x7ffcdee7ec57 count=0x1 pos=0xffff88023942ff20 */
2) 0.538 us | vfs_read();
3) | vfs_read() {
2) | /* vfs_read: (vfs_read+0x0/0x130) file=0xffff8803c24ba400 buf=0xd8efdc count=0x1ff0 pos=0xffff880052d1bf20 */
2) 0.979 us | vfs_read();
...
Thanks,
--
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-19 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-19 1:42 Ideas to measure kernel function execution time using perf Qu Wenruo
2016-04-19 23:37 ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2016-04-20 0:52 ` Qu Wenruo
2016-04-20 2:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 13:09 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160420083757.cba5cdd3038c7d82391b3b4c@kernel.org \
--to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).