From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Tracing sched_switch events for client application when process is switched back in
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2016 22:17:03 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161115011703.GL26543@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2210066.hO1CYxl5Jz@milian-kdab2>
Em Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 07:17:01PM +0100, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> On Monday, November 14, 2016 12:36:11 PM CET Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 03:10:26PM +0100, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> > > features:
> > > - sample CPU events for a given application with backtraces
> > > perf record --call-graph dwarf ./foo
> > > - record switch-out events with backtraces (`-e
> > > sched:sched_switch/fp=dwarf/`) - somehow record the switch-in events,
> > > which are associated with a different process and thus currently
> > > discarded
> > You want the backtraces with that, and since this is a meta-event... Humm,
> > for the switch in would the above be sufficient? What value would be in
> > knowing the backtrace in that case?
> Knowing the backtrace would ensure I get the real location that triggered a
> switch, i.e. often times that comes from a syscall like futex or the like. Or
Sure, sure, a backtrace for a sched switch _out_ of a thread is useful,
and that you get from the sched:sched_switch tracepoint, what I'm
alluding to is the lack of a backtrace with the PERF_RECORD_SWITCH _IN_,
meta-event i.e. when the kernel switchs back to the thread being
monitored.
> would I always get a CPU event (e.g. cycles) with a backtrace before the
Is there a need for that? With sched:sched_switch + backtrace you get a
backtrace right at the moment of the sched_switch _out_, then, with
PERF_RECORD_SWITCH (--switch-events) you'll get the missing piece, the
sched switch _in_, that gets a CPU back to your thread. You'll not know
from where it came (the thread using the CPU right before this switch),
unless you're root, then PERF_RECORD_SWITCH _will_ have that info.
> switch happens, pointing to the same location?
>
> > So something like would do? Try not looking at the "PERF_RECORD_SWITCH OUT"
> > lines, they are generated by the kernel _after_ the corresponding
> > sched:sched_switch is registered:
> >
> > [root@jouet ~]# perf record --call-graph=dwarf --switch-events -e
>
> <snip>
>
> Yes, that seems to work just fine:
>
> perf record -e cycles -e sched:sched_switch \
> --call-graph dwarf --switch-events \
> ./a.out
>
> That gives me all information. With some post-processing one could then turn
> this into a really useful profiling tool, as one will only need a single perf
> record step to allow both, on-CPU as well as off-CPU profiling for application
> developers.
right, off-cpu info in a 'perf trace' session is something we should
have, for instance. It should appear like a syscall, i.e. another way
out of the thread that will take some time to complete (sched_out ...
sched_in).
- Arnaldo
> Many thanks for the help, Arnaldo, and sorry again for the confusion on my
> side.
>
> Cheers
> --
> Milian Wolff | milian.wolff@kdab.com | Software Engineer
> KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
> Tel: +49-30-521325470
> KDAB - The Qt Experts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-15 1:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-06 15:52 Tracing sched_switch events for client application when process is switched back in Milian Wolff
2016-10-06 16:21 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-10-06 16:38 ` Milian Wolff
2016-10-11 0:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-11-14 14:10 ` Milian Wolff
2016-11-14 15:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-11-14 18:17 ` Milian Wolff
2016-11-15 1:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2016-11-16 11:17 ` Milian Wolff
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161115011703.GL26543@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).