From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: Feedback on patches? Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2017 12:10:09 -0300 Message-ID: <20170324151009.GC5148@kernel.org> References: <2870404.LJF2UlfSYK@agathebauer> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:40772 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935890AbdCXPKZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Mar 2017 11:10:25 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2870404.LJF2UlfSYK@agathebauer> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Milian Wolff Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org Em Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:59:03PM +0100, Milian Wolff escreveu: > Hey Arnaldo, others. > > Jin Yao has pushed an extremely valuable change set, whichs brings inlined > frames into view for perf report. So far, he has not gotten any feedback by > anyone except me. I was observing this from a distance, there was lively discussion, I was waiting for the dust to settle so that I could then look at the implementation aspects. > Similarly, I have pushed a changeset that complements his, i.e. the one that > adds `-g srcline`. That one has not gotten any feedback whatsoever. I saw that one now while looking for this one, that I saw earlier today on my smartphone. > So I'm asking - what is required to get these patches reviewed and included? I > consider both extremely important for C++ application developers like me, who > face inlined frames regularly due to template code. > Please consider reviewing and merging them. The more reviewers, the better, I'm making sure the pull requests I send to Ingo are CCed here, so that one can see what is being done that may be taking precedence to other stuff. But always do as you did here, if a reasonable time has passed without things you think are ready being merged, advocate for it, show numbers, etc. I'll try to look at it ASAP. - Arnaldo