From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: fix perf test case 14 result reporting
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2017 20:51:50 +0200
Message-ID: <20170604185141.GB18648@krava>
References: <20170601123441.24581-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20170601132038.GG2899@kernel.org>
 <20170601210451.GA5713@krava>
 <c06b8134-4636-c14f-c580-8b45e5256093@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20170602140936.GO2899@kernel.org>
 <20170602141105.GP2899@kernel.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20170602141105.GP2899@kernel.org>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 11:11:05AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:

SNIP

> > > 
> > > I suggest we should move the discussion to the linux-perf-users
> > > mailing list.
> > > 
> > > Your thoughts?
> > 
> > If you have specific patches in Jiri's branch that you think are good to
> > go, just point me to them and I'll cherry-pick them.
> > 
> > I'm looking now at the one you pointed out above (070b9644981e).
> 
> Just looked, but the cset comment should state what is the problem and
> how it is solved, right now it has just a one line summary :-\

yep, sry ;-)

jirka