From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Jan Kratochvil <jkratoch@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf report: ensure the perf DSO mapping matches what libdw sees
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 12:41:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170605104130.GB28871@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170602143753.16907-1-milian.wolff@kdab.com>
On Fri, Jun 02, 2017 at 04:37:52PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> In some situations the libdw unwinder stopped working properly.
> I.e. with libunwind we see:
>
> ~~~~~
> heaptrack_gui 2228 135073.400112: 641314 cycles:
> e8ed _dl_fixup (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so)
> 15f06 _dl_runtime_resolve_sse_vex (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so)
> ed94c KDynamicJobTracker::KDynamicJobTracker (/home/milian/projects/compiled/kf5/lib64/libKF5KIOWidgets.so.5.35.0)
> 608f3 _GLOBAL__sub_I_kdynamicjobtracker.cpp (/home/milian/projects/compiled/kf5/lib64/libKF5KIOWidgets.so.5.35.0)
> f199 call_init.part.0 (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so)
> f2a5 _dl_init (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so)
> db9 _dl_start_user (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so)
> ~~~~~
>
> But with libdw and without this patch this sample is not properly
> unwound:
>
> ~~~~~
> heaptrack_gui 2228 135073.400112: 641314 cycles:
> e8ed _dl_fixup (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so)
> 15f06 _dl_runtime_resolve_sse_vex (/usr/lib/ld-2.25.so)
> ed94c KDynamicJobTracker::KDynamicJobTracker (/home/milian/projects/compiled/kf5/lib64/libKF5KIOWidgets.so.5.35.0)
> ~~~~~
>
> Debug output showed me that libdw found a module for the last frame
> address, but it thinks it belongs to /usr/lib/ld-2.25.so. This patch
> double-checks what libdw sees and what perf knows. If the mappings
> mismatch, we now report the elf known to perf. This fixes the
> situation above, and the libdw unwinder produces the same stack as
> libunwind.
hum, sounds like libdw bug right? CC-ing Jan... any idea?
anyway, I think we can keep that as sanity check
thanks,
jirka
>
> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
> index b4c20124d2ee..da45c4be5fb3 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/unwind-libdw.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,14 @@ static int __report_module(struct addr_location *al, u64 ip,
> return 0;
>
> mod = dwfl_addrmodule(ui->dwfl, ip);
> + if (mod) {
> + Dwarf_Addr s;
> +
> + dwfl_module_info(mod, NULL, &s, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL, NULL);
> + if (s != al->map->start)
> + mod = 0;
> + }
> +
> if (!mod)
> mod = dwfl_report_elf(ui->dwfl, dso->short_name,
> dso->long_name, -1, al->map->start,
> --
> 2.13.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-05 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-02 14:37 [PATCH 1/2] perf report: ensure the perf DSO mapping matches what libdw sees Milian Wolff
2017-06-02 14:37 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf report: report module before querying isactivation in dwfl unwind Milian Wolff
2017-06-02 15:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-05 10:47 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-06-15 19:20 ` Jan Kratochvil
2017-06-16 16:06 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-16 17:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-02 15:23 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf report: ensure the perf DSO mapping matches what libdw sees Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-02 16:21 ` Milian Wolff
2017-06-02 19:49 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-06-03 11:36 ` Milian Wolff
2017-06-05 10:41 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-06-15 20:38 ` Jan Kratochvil
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170605104130.GB28871@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jkratoch@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).