From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] RFC perf test 14 add platform dependency Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2017 22:59:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20170619205944.GA19183@krava> References: <20170613090937.72899-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:41778 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752084AbdFSU7s (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2017 16:59:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170613090937.72899-1-tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-perf-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Thomas Richter Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 11:09:37AM +0200, Thomas Richter wrote: > This is a proposal to add platform dependency into the > test case 14 (perf_event_attr). It is based on a suggestion from > Jiri Olsa. > Add a new optional attribute named 'machine' in the [config] section > of the test case file. It is a comma separated list of architecture > names this test can be executed on. For example: > > machine = x86_64,alpha,ppc 'arch' sounds better to me, but machine is ok I guess > > If this attribute is missing the test is executed on any platform. > This does not break the current setup. > The values listed for this attribute should be identical to > uname -m output. > If the list starts with an exclamation mark (!) the comparison is > inverted, for example for > > machine = !s390x,ppc > > the test is not executed on s390x or ppc platforms. > The exclamation mark must be at the beginnning of the list. could that be per arch? this made me think that it's not s390 and it IS for ppc > > Here is an example debug output: > [root@s35lp76]# fgrep machine tests/attr/test-stat-C2 > machine = x86_64,alpha,ppc > [root@s35lp76]# PERF_TEST_ATTR=/tmp /usr/bin/python2 ./tests/attr.py \ > -d ./tests/attr/ -p ./perf -vvvvv -t test-stat-C1 > > provides the following output: > > running './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' > test executed only on 'x86_64,alpha,ppc' <--- new > loading expected events > Event event:base-stat > fd = 1 > group_fd = -1 > ..... > skipped [s390x] './tests/attr//test-stat-C1' <--- new is this mixed output from supported and non supported archs? if the arch is skip there's no output other than the skip line right? ther than above nits it looks ok to me thanks, jirka