From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
To: ravi <ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/16] perf report: properly handle branch count in match_chain
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:19:43 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171016141943.GC2567@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5f4372e7-8e75-bf34-3947-4b38036241a4@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Em Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 09:48:17AM +0530, ravi escreveu:
>
> On Friday 13 October 2017 07:38 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >Em Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 10:39:03AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> >>Em Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 10:33:05PM +0200, Milian Wolff escreveu:
> >>>Some of the code paths I introduced before returned too early
> >>>without running the code to handle a node's branch count.
> >>>By refactoring match_chain to only have one exit point, this
> >>>can be remedied.
> >>Fixing up this one now.
> >Millian, this is all fresher in your mind, can you please take a look at
> >my perf/core branch and check if the change i made to ]PATCH v5 09/16]
> >"perf report: compare symbol name for inlined frames when matching" is
> >ok wrt Ravi's fix and then, please, rebase v5 on top of what is there?
> >
> >Ravi, please take a look at this as well, to see if with these changes
> >your fix remains valid, ok?
>
> Yes Arnaldo, my changes are still valid.
I knot they are valid, probably my wording was unclear, I was asking if,
with Milian changes, and my fixing up to cope with your patch, that was
just in perf/urgent, while Milian work was done on perf/core, everything
worked for your use case.
- Arnaldo
> Milian, Can you please change this patch such that it incorporates dso
> comparison for CCKEY_FUNCTION.
>
> ( Also, will that be good to change macro to CCKEY_FUNCTION_DOS ?)
>
> Thanks,
> Ravi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-16 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-09 20:32 [PATCH v5 00/16] generate full callchain cursor entries for inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] perf report: remove code to handle inline frames from browsers Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] perf util: store srcline in callchain_cursor_node Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] perf util: refactor inline_list to operate on symbols Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] perf util: refactor inline_list to store srcline string directly Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:32 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] perf report: create real callchain entries for inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] perf report: fall-back to function name comparison for -g srcline Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] perf report: mark inlined frames in output by " (inlined)" suffix Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] perf script: mark inlined frames and do not print DSO for them Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] perf report: compare symbol name for inlined frames when matching Milian Wolff
2017-10-13 13:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] perf report: compare symbol name for inlined frames when sorting Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 11/16] perf report: properly handle branch count in match_chain Milian Wolff
2017-10-13 13:39 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-13 14:08 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-14 19:30 ` Milian Wolff
2017-10-16 14:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-10-16 4:18 ` ravi
2017-10-16 8:27 ` Milian Wolff
2017-10-16 14:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] perf report: cache failed lookups of inlined frames Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] perf report: cache srclines for callchain nodes Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] perf report: use srcline from callchain for hist entries Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] perf util: enable handling of inlined frames by default Milian Wolff
2017-10-09 20:33 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] perf util: use correct IP mapping to find srcline for hist entry Milian Wolff
2017-10-10 4:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-10-12 18:22 ` Milian Wolff
2017-10-12 18:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-13 11:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-10-13 1:19 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171016141943.GC2567@redhat.com \
--to=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.bangoria@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).