From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org
Subject: Re: measuring system wide CPU usage ignoring idle process
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 00:44:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171120234438.GA22397@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <215895928.dRJQAAs51a@agathebauer>
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 09:24:42PM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Montag, 20. November 2017 15:29:08 CET Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 03:00:46PM +0100, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > Hey all,
> > >
> > > colleagues of mine just brought this inconvenient perf stat behavior to my
> > > attention:
> > >
> > > $ perf stat -a -e cpu-clock,task-clock,cycles,instructions sleep 1
> > >
> > > Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
> > > 4004.501439 cpu-clock (msec) # 4.000 CPUs utilized
> > > 4004.526474 task-clock (msec) # 4.000 CPUs utilized
> > > 945,906,029 cycles # 0.236 GHz
> > > 461,861,241 instructions # 0.49 insn per
> > > cycle
> > >
> > > 1.001247082 seconds time elapsed
> > >
> > > This shows that cpu-clock and task-clock are incremented also for the idle
> > > processes. Is there some trick to exclude that time, such that the CPU
> > > utilization drops below 100% when doing `perf stat -a`?
> >
> > I dont think it's the idle process you see, I think it's the managing
> > overhead before the 'sleep 1' task goes actualy to sleep
> >
> > there's some user space code before it gets into the sleep syscall,
> > and there's some possible kernel scheduling/syscall/irq code with
> > events already enabled and counting
>
> Sorry for being unclear: I was talking about the task-clock and cpu-clock
> values which you omitted from your measurements below. My example also shows
> that the counts for cycles and instructions are fine. But the cpu-clock and
> task-clock are useless as they always sum up to essentially `$nproc*$runtime`.
> What I'm hoping for are fractional values for the "N CPUs utilized".
ugh my bad.. anyway by using -a you create cpu counters
which never unschedule, so those times will be same
as the 'sleep 1' run length
but not sure now how to get the real utilization.. will check
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-20 23:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-20 14:00 measuring system wide CPU usage ignoring idle process Milian Wolff
2017-11-20 14:29 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-20 20:24 ` Milian Wolff
2017-11-20 23:44 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2017-11-23 13:40 ` Milian Wolff
2017-11-23 14:09 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-23 14:21 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-23 14:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-23 15:12 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-23 18:59 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-11-24 8:14 ` Jiri Olsa
2017-11-23 15:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-04-17 13:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171120234438.GA22397@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).