From: linxiulei@gmail.com
To: peterz@infradead.org, jolsa@redhat.com, mingo@redhat.com,
acme@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, eranian@gmail.com,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
yang_oliver@hotmail.com, jinli.zjl@alibaba-inc.com,
"leilei.lin" <leilei.lin@alibaba-inc.com>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v4] perf/core: Fix installing cgroup event into cpu
Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 11:33:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180208033344.71933-1-linxiulei@gmail.com> (raw)
From: "leilei.lin" <leilei.lin@alibaba-inc.com>
Do not install cgroup event into the CPU context and schedule it
if the cgroup is not running on this CPU
While there is no task of cgroup running specified CPU, current
kernel still install cgroup event into CPU context that causes
another cgroup event can't be installed into this CPU.
This patch prevent scheduling events at __perf_install_in_context()
and installing events at list_update_cgroup_event() if cgroup isn't
running on specified CPU.
Signed-off-by: leilei.lin <leilei.lin@alibaba-inc.com>
---
v2: Set cpuctx->cgrp only if the same cgroup is running on this
CPU otherwise following events couldn't be activated immediately
v3: Enhance the comments and commit message
v4: Adjust to config
kernel/events/core.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 4df5b69..fd28d61 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -933,31 +933,41 @@ list_update_cgroup_event(struct perf_event *event,
{
struct perf_cpu_context *cpuctx;
struct list_head *cpuctx_entry;
+ struct perf_cgroup *cgrp;
if (!is_cgroup_event(event))
return;
- if (add && ctx->nr_cgroups++)
- return;
- else if (!add && --ctx->nr_cgroups)
- return;
/*
* Because cgroup events are always per-cpu events,
* this will always be called from the right CPU.
*/
cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
- cpuctx_entry = &cpuctx->cgrp_cpuctx_entry;
- /* cpuctx->cgrp is NULL unless a cgroup event is active in this CPU .*/
- if (add) {
- struct perf_cgroup *cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(current, ctx);
+ cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(current, ctx);
- list_add(cpuctx_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&cgrp_cpuctx_list));
- if (cgroup_is_descendant(cgrp->css.cgroup, event->cgrp->css.cgroup))
+ /*
+ * if only the cgroup is running on this cpu,
+ * we put/remove this cgroup into cpu context.
+ * Or it would case mismatch in following cgroup
+ * events at event_filter_match()
+ */
+ if (cgroup_is_descendant(cgrp->css.cgroup, event->cgrp->css.cgroup)) {
+ if (add)
cpuctx->cgrp = cgrp;
- } else {
- list_del(cpuctx_entry);
- cpuctx->cgrp = NULL;
+ else
+ cpuctx->cgrp = NULL;
}
+
+ if (add && ctx->nr_cgroups++)
+ return;
+ else if (!add && --ctx->nr_cgroups)
+ return;
+
+ cpuctx_entry = &cpuctx->cgrp_cpuctx_entry;
+ if (add)
+ list_add(cpuctx_entry, this_cpu_ptr(&cgrp_cpuctx_list));
+ else
+ list_del(cpuctx_entry);
}
#else /* !CONFIG_CGROUP_PERF */
@@ -2311,6 +2321,20 @@ static int __perf_install_in_context(void *info)
raw_spin_lock(&task_ctx->lock);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_CGROUP_PERF
+ if (is_cgroup_event(event)) {
+ /*
+ * Only care about cgroup events.
+ *
+ * If only the task belongs to cgroup of this event,
+ * we will continue the installment
+ */
+ struct perf_cgroup *cgrp = perf_cgroup_from_task(current, ctx);
+ reprogram = cgroup_is_descendant(cgrp->css.cgroup,
+ event->cgrp->css.cgroup);
+ }
+#endif
+
if (reprogram) {
ctx_sched_out(ctx, cpuctx, EVENT_TIME);
add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
--
2.8.4.31.g9ed660f
next reply other threads:[~2018-02-08 3:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-08 3:33 linxiulei [this message]
2018-02-08 15:36 ` [PATCH RESEND v4] perf/core: Fix installing cgroup event into cpu Jiri Olsa
2018-02-09 1:52 ` Lin Xiulei
2018-02-09 10:11 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-02-10 12:28 ` Lin Xiulei
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180208033344.71933-1-linxiulei@gmail.com \
--to=linxiulei@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@gmail.com \
--cc=jinli.zjl@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=leilei.lin@alibaba-inc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=yang_oliver@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).