From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf trace: remove redundant ')' Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 16:19:07 -0300 Message-ID: <20180403191907.GE23295@kernel.org> References: <1520937601-24952-1-git-send-email-changbin.du@intel.com> <20180316075108.xwenvklz3a6scodh@intel.com> <20180316125045.GC10026@kernel.org> <20180328072631.gj72odnaimsohkmc@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180328072631.gj72odnaimsohkmc@intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: "Du, Changbin" Cc: jolsa@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com, namhyung@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 03:26:31PM +0800, Du, Changbin escreveu: > Hi Arnaldo, > Just a kind reminder. Hope you didn't forget this. Ok, applied. - Arnaldo > On Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 09:50:45AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > Em Fri, Mar 16, 2018 at 03:51:09PM +0800, Du, Changbin escreveu: > > > Hi Arnaldo, How about this simple one? Thanks. > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 06:40:01PM +0800, changbin.du@intel.com wrote: > > > > From: Changbin Du > > > > > > > > There is a redundant ')' at the tail of each event. So remove it. > > > > $ sudo perf trace --no-syscalls -e 'kmem:*' -a > > > > 899.342 kmem:kfree:(vfs_writev+0xb9) call_site=ffffffff9c453979 ptr=(nil)) > > > > 899.344 kmem:kfree:(___sys_recvmsg+0x188) call_site=ffffffff9c9b8b88 ptr=(nil)) > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Changbin Du > > > > --- > > > > tools/perf/builtin-trace.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c > > > > index e7f1b18..7273f5f 100644 > > > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c > > > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-trace.c > > > > @@ -1959,7 +1959,7 @@ static int trace__event_handler(struct trace *trace, struct perf_evsel *evsel, > > > > trace->output); > > > > } > > > > > > > > - fprintf(trace->output, ")\n"); > > > > + fprintf(trace->output, "\n"); > > > > It looks simple on the surface, but I couldn't quickly recall why this > > ')' was put there in the first place... So I left for later to do a 'git > > blame' on this file, etc. > > > > - Arnaldo > > > > > > if (callchain_ret > 0) > > > > trace__fprintf_callchain(trace, sample); > > > > -- > > > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Thanks, > > > Changbin Du > > -- > Thanks, > Changbin Du