From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kim Phillips Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] perf tests parse-events: Add intel_pt parse test Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 17:54:10 -0500 Message-ID: <20180517175410.d23409d805581923bc456ec2@arm.com> References: <20180516144908.22212-1-acme@kernel.org> <20180516144908.22212-2-acme@kernel.org> <20180516163355.d8e4c669ad29d416e9ffb13e@arm.com> <20180517201553.GB25467@kernel.org> <20180517205811.GE12497@krava> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180517205811.GE12497@krava> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Jiri Olsa , Ingo Molnar , Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Adrian Hunter , Alexander Shishkin , Andi Kleen , David Ahern , Kan Liang , Namhyung Kim , Peter Zijlstra , Wang Nan List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 May 2018 22:58:11 +0200 Jiri Olsa wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 05:15:53PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > > So parse_state->error == NULL, Jiri, ideas? > > yep, we don't use it in tests.. and when trying intel_pt on > system without that pmu, the parse_events_add_pmu fails > and store the error to NULL.. we should check on that err pointer > > wrt to the test itself, how about we add callback > to check if the test is valid before we run it, > something like below > jirka That diff makes this test pass again on x86 without an intel_pt, and on Arm32/64 (the intel_pt test gets skipped on those machines): Tested-by: Kim Phillips Thanks, Kim