From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf script: flush output stream after events in verbose mode
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 12:16:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181022101618.GH2452@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4444017.LnbBPIbh24@agathebauer>
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 12:09:22PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Montag, 22. Oktober 2018 11:43:17 CEST Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 09:14:24PM +0200, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > When the perf script output is written to a terminal stream,
> > > the normal output of `perf script` would get buffered, but its
> > > debug output would be written directly. This made it quite hard
> > > to figure out where a given debug output is coming from. We can
> > > improve on this by flushing the output buffer after processing an
> > > event. To see the value, compare the following output for a
> > > `perf script -v` run:
> > >
> > > Before this patch:
> > > ```
> > > unwind: reg 16, val 7faf7dfdc000
> > > unwind: reg 7, val 7ffc80811e30
> > > unwind: find_proc_info dso /usr/lib/ld-2.28.so
> > > unwind: reg 6, val 0
> > > unwind: _start:ip = 0x7faf7dfdc000 (0x2000)
> > > unwind: reg 16, val 7faf7dfdc000
> > > unwind: reg 7, val 7ffc80811e30
> > > unwind: find_proc_info dso /usr/lib/ld-2.28.so
> > > unwind: reg 6, val 0
> > > unwind: _start:ip = 0x7faf7dfdc000 (0x2000)
> > > unwind: reg 16, val 7faf7dfdc000
> > > unwind: reg 7, val 7ffc80811e30
> > > unwind: find_proc_info dso /usr/lib/ld-2.28.so
> > > unwind: reg 6, val 0
> > > unwind: _start:ip = 0x7faf7dfdc000 (0x2000)
> > > unwind: reg 16, val 7faf7dfdc000
> > > unwind: reg 7, val 7ffc80811e30
> > > ... lots and lots of verbose debug output
> > >
> > > cpp-inlining 24617 90229.122036534: 1 cycles:uppp:
> > > 7faf7dfdc000 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/ld-2.28.so)
> > >
> > > cpp-inlining 24617 90229.122043974: 1 cycles:uppp:
> > > 7faf7dfdc000 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/ld-2.28.so)
> > >
> > > ...
> > > ```
> > >
> > > After this patch:
> > > ```
> > > ...
> > > unwind: reg 16, val 7faf7dfdc000
> > > unwind: reg 7, val 7ffc80811e30
> > > unwind: find_proc_info dso /usr/lib/ld-2.28.so
> > > unwind: reg 6, val 0
> > > unwind: _start:ip = 0x7faf7dfdc000 (0x2000)
> > >
> > > cpp-inlining 24617 90229.122036534: 1 cycles:uppp:
> > > 7faf7dfdc000 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/ld-2.28.so)
> > >
> > > unwind: reg 16, val 7faf7dfdc000
> > > unwind: reg 7, val 7ffc80811e30
> > > unwind: find_proc_info dso /usr/lib/ld-2.28.so
> > > unwind: reg 6, val 0
> > > unwind: _start:ip = 0x7faf7dfdc000 (0x2000)
> > >
> > > cpp-inlining 24617 90229.122043974: 1 cycles:uppp:
> > > 7faf7dfdc000 _start+0x0 (/usr/lib/ld-2.28.so)
> > >
> > > ...
> > > ```
> > >
> > > This new output format makes it much easier to use perf script
> > > output for debugging purposes, e.g. to investigate broken dwarf
> > > unwinding.
> >
> > yep, I plan to check on this ;-)
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
> > > Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
> > > ---
> > >
> > > tools/perf/builtin-script.c | 3 +++
> > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> > > index bd468b90801b..ca09b7d2adb7 100644
> > > --- a/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> > > +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-script.c
> > > @@ -1737,6 +1737,9 @@ static void process_event(struct perf_script
> > > *script,
> > >
> > > if (PRINT_FIELD(METRIC))
> > >
> > > perf_sample__fprint_metric(script, thread, evsel, sample, fp);
> > >
> > > +
> > > + if (verbose)
> > > + fflush(fp);
> >
> > should we call fflush(NULL) to dump all the streams?
> >
> > the verbose goes to stderr and fp seems to be stdout byt default
>
> stderr isn't buffered, so we don't need to flush it. So personally, I don't
> see a need to dump all streams - fp should be enough? Can you maybe explain
> where it would be required to flush more buffers?
hum, did not know stderr wasn't buffer
I think there's perf script feature to store the events data to
separate files per each event.. but I guess we don't need to
flush them.. we just need to have stdout and stderr in sync IIUC
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-10-22 10:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-10-21 19:14 [PATCH 1/2] perf script: allow extended console debug output Milian Wolff
2018-10-21 19:14 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf script: flush output stream after events in verbose mode Milian Wolff
2018-10-22 9:43 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-10-22 10:09 ` Milian Wolff
2018-10-22 10:16 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2018-10-22 10:38 ` Milian Wolff
2018-10-22 13:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2018-10-22 17:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2018-10-22 9:40 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf script: allow extended console debug output Jiri Olsa
2018-10-22 15:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20181022101618.GH2452@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).