From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: [PATCH 05/29] perf trace: Use correct SECCOMP prefix spelling, "SECOMP_*" -> "SECCOMP_*" Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2019 09:45:45 -0300 Message-ID: <20190103124609.29672-6-acme@kernel.org> References: <20190103124609.29672-1-acme@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20190103124609.29672-1-acme@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ingo Molnar Cc: Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Colin Ian King , Alexander Shishkin , Peter Zijlstra , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org From: Colin Ian King The spelling of the SECCOMP is incorrect, fix these. Signed-off-by: Colin King Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Fixes: c65c83ffe904 ("perf trace: Allow asking for not suppressing common string prefixes") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20181221084809.6108-1-colin.king@canonical.com Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c index 4600c28a3cfe..637722e2796b 100644 --- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c +++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/seccomp.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_op(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscall_arg *arg) { bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix; - const char *prefix = "SECOMP_SET_MODE_"; + const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_SET_MODE_"; int op = arg->val; size_t printed = 0; @@ -34,7 +34,7 @@ static size_t syscall_arg__scnprintf_seccomp_flags(char *bf, size_t size, struct syscall_arg *arg) { bool show_prefix = arg->show_string_prefix; - const char *prefix = "SECOMP_FILTER_FLAG_"; + const char *prefix = "SECCOMP_FILTER_FLAG_"; int printed = 0, flags = arg->val; #define P_FLAG(n) \ -- 2.19.2