From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: Add check_period pmu callback Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:11:39 +0100 Message-ID: <20190211101139.GV32511@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <7c7ec3d9-9af6-8a1d-515d-64dcf8e89b78@linux.ibm.com> <20190130183648.GA24233@krava> <20190131082711.GC24233@krava> <20190201074353.GA8778@krava> <20190201173816.GA19907@krava> <20190204123532.GA4794@krava> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190204123532.GA4794@krava> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Olsa Cc: Vince Weaver , Ravi Bangoria , lkml , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Andi Kleen , eranian@google.com, "Naveen N. Rao" , Ingo Molnar List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 04, 2019 at 01:35:32PM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote: > Vince (and later on Ravi) reported crash in BTS code during > fuzzing with following backtrace: > > general protection fault: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI > ... > RIP: 0010:perf_prepare_sample+0x8f/0x510 > ... > Call Trace: > > ? intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer+0x194/0x230 > intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer+0x160/0x230 > ? tick_nohz_irq_exit+0x31/0x40 > ? smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x48/0xe0 > ? call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 > ? call_function_single_interrupt+0xa/0x20 > ? x86_schedule_events+0x1a0/0x2f0 > ? x86_pmu_commit_txn+0xb4/0x100 > ? find_busiest_group+0x47/0x5d0 > ? perf_event_set_state.part.42+0x12/0x50 > ? perf_mux_hrtimer_restart+0x40/0xb0 > intel_pmu_disable_event+0xae/0x100 > ? intel_pmu_disable_event+0xae/0x100 > x86_pmu_stop+0x7a/0xb0 > x86_pmu_del+0x57/0x120 > event_sched_out.isra.101+0x83/0x180 > group_sched_out.part.103+0x57/0xe0 > ctx_sched_out+0x188/0x240 > ctx_resched+0xa8/0xd0 > __perf_event_enable+0x193/0x1e0 > event_function+0x8e/0xc0 > remote_function+0x41/0x50 > flush_smp_call_function_queue+0x68/0x100 > generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x13/0x30 > smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x3e/0xe0 > call_function_single_interrupt+0xf/0x20 > > > The reason is that while event init code does several checks > for BTS events and prevents several unwanted config bits for > BTS event (like precise_ip), the PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD allows > to create BTS event without those checks being done. > > Following sequence will cause the crash: > - create 'almost' BTS event with precise_ip and callchains, > (perf command line -e option equiv.): > > -e cpu/branch-instructions/up -c 2 -g > > - change the period of that event to '1', which will turn > it to BTS event, with precise_ip and callchains > > That will immediately cause crash in perf_prepare_sample > function because precise_ip events are expected to come > in with callchain data initialized, but that's not the > case for intel_pmu_drain_bts_buffer caller. > > Adding a check_period callback to be called before the period > is changed via PERF_EVENT_IOC_PERIOD. It will deny the change > if the event would become BTS. Plus adding also the limit_period > check as well. > > Cc: Vince Weaver > Cc: Ravi Bangoria > Reported-by: Vince Weaver > Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Thanks Jiri!