From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Cc: "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org"
<linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org>, Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
arcml <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 10:36:18 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190502143618.GH21436@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA2307501A2506BF3@us01wembx1.internal.synopsys.com>
Em Wed, May 01, 2019 at 09:17:52PM +0000, Vineet Gupta escreveu:
> On 5/1/19 1:41 PM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >> The 1a787fc5ba18ac7 commit copied over the changes for arm64, but
> >> missed all the other architectures changed in c8ce48f06503 and the
> >> related commits.
> > Right, I have a patch copying the missing headers, and that fixed the
> > build with the glibc-based toolchain, but then broke the uCLibc one :-\
> tools/perf/util/cloexec.c #includes <sys/syscall.h> which for glibc includes
> asm/unistd.h
> uClibc <sys/syscall.h> OTOH #include <bits/sysnum.h> containign#define __NR_*
> (generated by parsing kernel's unistd). This header does the right thing by
> chekcing for redefs, but in the end we still collide with newly added
> tools/arc/arc/*/**/unistd.h which doesn't have conditional definitions. I'm sure
> this is not an ARC problem, any uClibc build would be affected. Do you have a arm
> uclibc toolchain to test ?
This solves it for fedora:29,
arc_gnu_2017.09-rc2_prebuilt_uclibc_le_arc700_linux_install,
arc_gnu_2019.03-rc1_prebuilt_uclibc_le_archs_linux_install and
arc_gnu_2019.03-rc1_prebuilt_glibc_le_archs_linux_install.
Also ok with:
make -C tools/perf build-test
Now build testing with the full set of containers.
- Arnaldo
commit 1931594a680dba28e98b526192dd065430c850c0
Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Date: Thu May 2 09:26:23 2019 -0400
perf tools: Remove needless asm/unistd.h include fixing build in some places
We were including sys/syscall.h and asm/unistd.h, since sys/syscall.h
includes asm/unistd.h, sometimes this leads to the redefinition of
defines, breaking the build.
Noticed on ARC with uCLibc.
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Rich Felker <dalias@libc.org>
Cc: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-xjpf80o64i2ko74aj2jih0qg@git.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c b/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
index ca0fff6272be..06f48312c5ed 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/cloexec.c
@@ -7,7 +7,6 @@
#include "asm/bug.h"
#include "debug.h"
#include <unistd.h>
-#include <asm/unistd.h>
#include <sys/syscall.h>
static unsigned long flag = PERF_FLAG_FD_CLOEXEC;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-05-02 14:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-19 23:32 perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1 Vineet Gupta
2019-04-22 15:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-25 21:48 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-26 19:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-26 19:35 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-29 17:23 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-29 17:14 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-30 1:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-04-30 15:53 ` Detecting libc in perf (was Re: perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1) Vineet Gupta
2019-04-30 17:04 ` Rich Felker
2019-04-30 17:13 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-01 3:12 ` Rich Felker
2019-05-02 16:55 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 20:09 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 16:53 ` perf tools build broken after v5.1-rc1 Vineet Gupta
2019-04-29 17:17 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-04-30 16:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-05-01 20:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-01 21:17 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 14:36 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2019-05-02 15:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 16:09 ` Vineet Gupta
2019-05-02 16:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2019-05-02 17:10 ` Vineet Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190502143618.GH21436@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=Vineet.Gupta1@synopsys.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=dalias@libc.org \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).