From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: Re: [PATCH] libbpf: Use PRIu64 for sym->st_value to fix build on 32-bit arches Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:45:26 -0300 Message-ID: <20191127184526.GB4063@kernel.org> References: <20191126190450.GD29071@kernel.org> <20191126221018.GA22719@kernel.org> <20191126221733.GB22719@kernel.org> <20191126231030.GE3145429@mini-arch.hsd1.ca.comcast.net> <20191126155228.0e6ed54c@cakuba.netronome.com> <20191127013901.GE29071@kernel.org> <20191127134553.GC22719@kernel.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Andrii Nakryiko , Jakub Kicinski , Stanislav Fomichev , Toke =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= , Andrii Nakryiko , Adrian Hunter , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Jiri Olsa , Martin KaFai Lau , Namhyung Kim , bpf , Networking , linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Quentin Monnet List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org Em Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 08:39:28AM -0800, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 5:45 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo > wrote: > > > > Another fix I'm carrying in my perf/core branch, > Why in perf/core? > I very much prefer all libbpf patches to go via normal route via bpf/net trees. > We had enough conflicts in this merge window. Let's avoid them. Humm, if we both carry the same patch the merge process can do its magic and nobody gets hurt? Besides these are really minor things, no? - Arnaldo