From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] perf/tools: Enhance JSON/metric infrastructure to
 handle "?"
Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 11:52:14 +0100
Message-ID: <20200312105214.GD311223@krava>
References: <20200309062552.29911-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com>
 <20200309062552.29911-7-kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20200309062552.29911-7-kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
To: Kajol Jain <kjain@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, jmario@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, paulus@ozlabs.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de
List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:55:50AM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote:

SNIP

> +static int metricgroup__add_metric_runtime_param(struct strbuf *events,
> +			struct list_head *group_list, struct pmu_event *pe)
> +{
> +	int i, count;
> +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	count = arch_get_runtimeparam();
> +
> +	/* This loop is added to create multiple
> +	 * events depend on count value and add
> +	 * those events to group_list.
> +	 */
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
> +		const char **ids;
> +		int idnum;
> +		struct egroup *eg;
> +		char value[PATH_MAX];
> +
> +		expr__runtimeparam = i;
> +
> +		if (expr__find_other(pe->metric_expr,
> +					NULL, &ids, &idnum) < 0)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		if (events->len > 0)
> +			strbuf_addf(events, ",");
> +
> +		if (metricgroup__has_constraint(pe))
> +			metricgroup__add_metric_non_group(events, ids, idnum);
> +		else
> +			metricgroup__add_metric_weak_group(events, ids, idnum);
> +
> +		eg = malloc(sizeof(struct egroup));
> +		if (!eg) {
> +			ret = -ENOMEM;
> +			return ret;
> +		}
> +		sprintf(value, "%s%c%d", pe->metric_name, '_', i);
> +		eg->ids = ids;
> +		eg->idnum = idnum;
> +		eg->metric_name = strdup(value);
> +		eg->metric_expr = pe->metric_expr;
> +		eg->metric_unit = pe->unit;
> +		list_add_tail(&eg->nd, group_list);
> +		ret = 0;
> +
> +		if (ret != 0)
> +			break;

the inside loop is essentialy what you factor out to
metricgroup__add_metric_param right? please nove
addition of metricgroup__add_metric_param function
into separate patch

jirka


> +	}
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +static int metricgroup__add_metric_param(struct strbuf *events,
> +			struct list_head *group_list, struct pmu_event *pe)
> +{
> +
> +	const char **ids;
> +	int idnum;
> +	struct egroup *eg;
> +	int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> +	if (expr__find_other(pe->metric_expr,
> +					     NULL, &ids, &idnum) < 0)
> +		return ret;
> +	if (events->len > 0)
> +		strbuf_addf(events, ",");
> +
> +	if (metricgroup__has_constraint(pe))
> +		metricgroup__add_metric_non_group(events, ids, idnum);
> +	else
> +		metricgroup__add_metric_weak_group(events, ids, idnum);
> +
> +	eg = malloc(sizeof(struct egroup));
> +	if (!eg)
> +		ret = -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	eg->ids = ids;
> +	eg->idnum = idnum;
> +	eg->metric_name = pe->metric_name;
> +	eg->metric_expr = pe->metric_expr;
> +	eg->metric_unit = pe->unit;
> +	list_add_tail(&eg->nd, group_list);
> +	ret = 0;
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

SNIP