From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] perf tools: add support for libpfm4 Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:27:17 +0100 Message-ID: <20200324102717.GQ1534489@krava> References: <20200323235846.104937-1-irogers@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200323235846.104937-1-irogers@google.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ian Rogers Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Namhyung Kim , Alexei Starovoitov , Daniel Borkmann , Martin KaFai Lau , Yonghong Song , Andrii Nakryiko , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Thomas Gleixner , Igor Lubashev , Alexey Budankov , Florian Fainelli , Adrian Hunter , Andi Kleen , Jiwei Sun , yuzhouji List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 04:58:46PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote: SNIP > + > +int parse_libpfm_events_option(const struct option *opt, const char *str, > + int unset __maybe_unused) > +{ > + struct evlist *evlist = *(struct evlist **)opt->value; > + struct perf_event_attr attr; > + struct perf_pmu *pmu; > + struct evsel *evsel, *grp_leader = NULL; > + char *p, *q, *p_orig; > + const char *sep; > + int grp_evt = -1; > + int ret; > + > + p_orig = p = strdup(str); > + if (!p) > + return -1; > + /* > + * force loading of the PMU list > + */ > + perf_pmu__scan(NULL); > + > + for (q = p; strsep(&p, ",{}"); q = p) { it seems like this code could be really easily testtable, could you please write simple test for this? thanks, jirka