From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Olsa Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/6] perf/tools: Refactoring metricgroup__add_metric function Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 21:36:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20200330193644.GF2490231@krava> References: <20200327102528.4267-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> <20200327102528.4267-4-kjain@linux.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200327102528.4267-4-kjain@linux.ibm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Kajol Jain Cc: acme@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, anju@linux.vnet.ibm.com, maddy@linux.vnet.ibm.com, ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, yao.jin@linux.intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com, jolsa@kernel.org, kan.liang@linux.intel.com, jmario@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, mingo@kernel.org, paulus@ozlabs.org, namhyung@kernel.org, mpetlan@redhat.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, benh@kernel.crashing.org, mamatha4@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de List-Id: linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 03:55:25PM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote: SNIP > + eg->ids = ids; > + eg->idnum = idnum; > + eg->metric_name = pe->metric_name; > + eg->metric_expr = pe->metric_expr; > + eg->metric_unit = pe->unit; > + list_add_tail(&eg->nd, group_list); > + > + return 0; > +} > + > static int metricgroup__add_metric(const char *metric, struct strbuf *events, > struct list_head *group_list) > { > @@ -504,35 +538,12 @@ static int metricgroup__add_metric(const char *metric, struct strbuf *events, > continue; > if (match_metric(pe->metric_group, metric) || > match_metric(pe->metric_name, metric)) { > - const char **ids; > - int idnum; > - struct egroup *eg; > > pr_debug("metric expr %s for %s\n", pe->metric_expr, pe->metric_name); > > - if (expr__find_other(pe->metric_expr, > - NULL, &ids, &idnum) < 0) > + ret = __metricgroup__add_metric(events, group_list, pe); > + if (ret == -EINVAL || !ret) > continue; what's the point of continue in here? it's end of the loop.. jirka