From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] perf intel-pt: Add support for synthesizing callchains for regular events
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2020 18:37:04 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200417213704.GB21512@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5b8f28f5-968f-bfff-68af-ed0350a90765@intel.com>
Em Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 04:50:00PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 16/04/20 6:14 pm, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:16:08PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> >> Currently, callchains can be synthesized only for synthesized events.
> >> Support also synthesizing callchains for regular events.
> >
> > This is super cool, I wonder if we shouldn't do it automatically or just
> > adding a new type of callchains, i.e.:
> >
> > perf record --call-graph pt uname
> >
> > Should take care of all the details, i.e. do the extra steps below
> > behind the scenes.
> >
> > Possibly even find out that the workload specified was built with
> > -fomit-frame-pointers, that the hardware has Intel PT and do all behind
> > the scenes for:
> >
> > perf record -g uname
> >
> > Alternatively we could take some less seemingly far fetched approach and
> > make this configurable via:
> >
> > perf config call-graph.record-mode=pt
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Adding a --call-graph option sounds reasonable, and config to define default
> callgraph options. But this was done at Andi Kleen's request, so he may
> want to comment.
Andi? My concern is that if this is the optimal solution for a good
subset of the machines out there, then we need to make it easy to use,
even transparent, if possible and safe to take that path.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-17 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20200401101613.6201-1-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20200401101613.6201-12-adrian.hunter@intel.com>
2020-04-16 15:14 ` [PATCH 11/16] perf intel-pt: Add support for synthesizing callchains for regular events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-04-17 13:50 ` Adrian Hunter
2020-04-17 21:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-04-20 3:04 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200417213704.GB21512@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).