From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf record: add dummy event during system wide synthesis
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:46:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200422084635.GF962614@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421061103.109440-1-irogers@google.com>
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:11:03PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> During the processing of /proc during event synthesis new processes may
> start. Add a dummy event if /proc is to be processed, to capture mmaps
> for starting processes. This reuses the existing logic for
> initial-delay.
>
> v2 fixes the dummy event configuration and a branch stack issue.
heya,
it's breaking attr tests for me:
[jolsa@krava perf]$ sudo ./perf test -v 17
17: Setup struct perf_event_attr :
--- start ---
test child forked, pid 1046560
running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-default'
running './tests/attr/test-record-raw'
running './tests/attr/test-record-branch-filter-any'
running './tests/attr/test-record-freq'
running './tests/attr/test-record-branch-any'
running './tests/attr/test-stat-group1'
running './tests/attr/test-record-no-samples'
running './tests/attr/test-record-graph-dwarf'
running './tests/attr/test-stat-C0'
running './tests/attr/test-stat-basic'
running './tests/attr/test-record-group'
running './tests/attr/test-record-branch-filter-k'
running './tests/attr/test-stat-group'
running './tests/attr/test-record-C0'
expected config=0, got 9
expected sample_type=391, got 455
expected disabled=1, got 0
FAILED './tests/attr/test-record-C0' - match failure
test child finished with -1
---- end ----
Setup struct perf_event_attr: FAILED!
jirka
>
> Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 19 ++++++++++++++-----
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 5 ++++-
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 1ab349abe904..8d1e93351298 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -805,19 +805,28 @@ static int record__open(struct record *rec)
> int rc = 0;
>
> /*
> - * For initial_delay we need to add a dummy event so that we can track
> - * PERF_RECORD_MMAP while we wait for the initial delay to enable the
> - * real events, the ones asked by the user.
> + * For initial_delay or system wide, we need to add a dummy event so
> + * that we can track PERF_RECORD_MMAP to cover the delay of waiting or
> + * event synthesis.
> */
> - if (opts->initial_delay) {
> + if (opts->initial_delay || target__has_cpu(&opts->target)) {
> if (perf_evlist__add_dummy(evlist))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + /* Disable tracking of mmaps on lead event. */
> pos = evlist__first(evlist);
> pos->tracking = 0;
> + /* Set up dummy event. */
> pos = evlist__last(evlist);
> pos->tracking = 1;
> - pos->core.attr.enable_on_exec = 1;
> + /*
> + * Enable the dummy event when the process is forked for
> + * initial_delay, immediately for system wide.
> + */
> + if (opts->initial_delay)
> + pos->core.attr.enable_on_exec = 1;
> + else
> + pos->immediate = 1;
> }
>
> perf_evlist__config(evlist, opts, &callchain_param);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 6a571d322bb2..ca8f9533d8f9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1163,11 +1163,14 @@ void perf_evsel__config(struct evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts,
> }
>
> /*
> + * A dummy event never triggers any actual counter and therefore
> + * cannot be used with branch_stack.
> + *
> * For initial_delay, a dummy event is added implicitly.
> * The software event will trigger -EOPNOTSUPP error out,
> * if BRANCH_STACK bit is set.
> */
> - if (opts->initial_delay && is_dummy_event(evsel))
> + if (is_dummy_event(evsel))
> perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK);
> }
>
> --
> 2.26.1.301.g55bc3eb7cb9-goog
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-22 8:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 6:11 [PATCH v2] perf record: add dummy event during system wide synthesis Ian Rogers
2020-04-22 8:46 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-04-22 17:37 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200422084635.GF962614@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).