From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
To: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] perf record: add dummy event during system wide synthesis
Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 22:54:35 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200520015435.GB32678@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200422173615.59436-1-irogers@google.com>
Em Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:36:15AM -0700, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> During the processing of /proc during event synthesis new processes may
> start. Add a dummy event if /proc is to be processed, to capture mmaps
> for starting processes. This reuses the existing logic for
> initial-delay.
>
> v3 fixes the attr test of test-record-C0
> v2 fixes the dummy event configuration and a branch stack issue.
Something I noticed only now is that this ends up in the perf.data file,
and we don't need it at all there, i.e.
# perf record -I
I.e. system wide, asking for registers now ends up with:
[root@quaco ~]# perf record -I
^C[ perf record: Woken up 1 times to write data ]
[ perf record: Captured and wrote 2.855 MB perf.data (4902 samples) ]
[root@quaco ~]# perf evlist
cycles
dummy:HG
[root@quaco ~]# perf evlist -v
cycles: size: 120, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ID|CPU|PERIOD|REGS_INTR, read_format: ID, disabled: 1, inherit: 1, freq: 1, precise_ip: 3, sample_id_all: 1, exclude_guest: 1, sample_regs_intr: 0xff0fff
dummy:HG: type: 1, size: 120, config: 0x9, { sample_period, sample_freq }: 4000, sample_type: IP|TID|TIME|ID|CPU|PERIOD|REGS_INTR, read_format: ID, inherit: 1, mmap: 1, comm: 1, freq: 1, task: 1, sample_id_all: 1, mmap2: 1, comm_exec: 1, ksymbol: 1, bpf_event: 1, sample_regs_intr: 0xff0fff
[root@quaco ~]#
For perf top is ok to reuse the main evlist, as those are not going to
hit the disk, but for 'perf record' it pollutes the perf.data file with
that dummy event.
This was a problem introduced with initial-delay, that IIRC predates the
side band thread tho, I'll have to think about it, just writing this
down to revisit this, as may raise some eyebrows by now being more
exposed.
- Arnaldo
> Suggested-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
> tools/perf/builtin-record.c | 19 +++++++---
> tools/perf/tests/attr/system-wide-dummy | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tools/perf/tests/attr/test-record-C0 | 12 +++++-
> tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 5 ++-
> 4 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 tools/perf/tests/attr/system-wide-dummy
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> index 1ab349abe904..8d1e93351298 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-record.c
> @@ -805,19 +805,28 @@ static int record__open(struct record *rec)
> int rc = 0;
>
> /*
> - * For initial_delay we need to add a dummy event so that we can track
> - * PERF_RECORD_MMAP while we wait for the initial delay to enable the
> - * real events, the ones asked by the user.
> + * For initial_delay or system wide, we need to add a dummy event so
> + * that we can track PERF_RECORD_MMAP to cover the delay of waiting or
> + * event synthesis.
> */
> - if (opts->initial_delay) {
> + if (opts->initial_delay || target__has_cpu(&opts->target)) {
> if (perf_evlist__add_dummy(evlist))
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> + /* Disable tracking of mmaps on lead event. */
> pos = evlist__first(evlist);
> pos->tracking = 0;
> + /* Set up dummy event. */
> pos = evlist__last(evlist);
> pos->tracking = 1;
> - pos->core.attr.enable_on_exec = 1;
> + /*
> + * Enable the dummy event when the process is forked for
> + * initial_delay, immediately for system wide.
> + */
> + if (opts->initial_delay)
> + pos->core.attr.enable_on_exec = 1;
> + else
> + pos->immediate = 1;
> }
>
> perf_evlist__config(evlist, opts, &callchain_param);
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/attr/system-wide-dummy b/tools/perf/tests/attr/system-wide-dummy
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..eba723cc0d38
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/attr/system-wide-dummy
> @@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
> +# Event added by system-wide or CPU perf-record to handle the race of
> +# processes starting while /proc is processed.
> +[event]
> +fd=1
> +group_fd=-1
> +cpu=*
> +pid=-1
> +flags=8
> +type=1
> +size=120
> +config=9
> +sample_period=4000
> +sample_type=455
> +read_format=4
> +# Event will be enabled right away.
> +disabled=0
> +inherit=1
> +pinned=0
> +exclusive=0
> +exclude_user=0
> +exclude_kernel=0
> +exclude_hv=0
> +exclude_idle=0
> +mmap=1
> +comm=1
> +freq=1
> +inherit_stat=0
> +enable_on_exec=0
> +task=1
> +watermark=0
> +precise_ip=0
> +mmap_data=0
> +sample_id_all=1
> +exclude_host=0
> +exclude_guest=0
> +exclude_callchain_kernel=0
> +exclude_callchain_user=0
> +mmap2=1
> +comm_exec=1
> +context_switch=0
> +write_backward=0
> +namespaces=0
> +use_clockid=0
> +wakeup_events=0
> +bp_type=0
> +config1=0
> +config2=0
> +branch_sample_type=0
> +sample_regs_user=0
> +sample_stack_user=0
> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/attr/test-record-C0 b/tools/perf/tests/attr/test-record-C0
> index 93818054ae20..317730b906dd 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/attr/test-record-C0
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/attr/test-record-C0
> @@ -9,6 +9,14 @@ cpu=0
> # no enable on exec for CPU attached
> enable_on_exec=0
>
> -# PERF_SAMPLE_IP | PERF_SAMPLE_TID PERF_SAMPLE_TIME | # PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD
> +# PERF_SAMPLE_IP | PERF_SAMPLE_TID | PERF_SAMPLE_TIME |
> +# PERF_SAMPLE_ID | PERF_SAMPLE_PERIOD
> # + PERF_SAMPLE_CPU added by -C 0
> -sample_type=391
> +sample_type=455
> +
> +# Dummy event handles mmaps, comm and task.
> +mmap=0
> +comm=0
> +task=0
> +
> +[event:system-wide-dummy]
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> index 6a571d322bb2..ca8f9533d8f9 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> @@ -1163,11 +1163,14 @@ void perf_evsel__config(struct evsel *evsel, struct record_opts *opts,
> }
>
> /*
> + * A dummy event never triggers any actual counter and therefore
> + * cannot be used with branch_stack.
> + *
> * For initial_delay, a dummy event is added implicitly.
> * The software event will trigger -EOPNOTSUPP error out,
> * if BRANCH_STACK bit is set.
> */
> - if (opts->initial_delay && is_dummy_event(evsel))
> + if (is_dummy_event(evsel))
> perf_evsel__reset_sample_bit(evsel, BRANCH_STACK);
> }
>
> --
> 2.26.2.303.gf8c07b1a785-goog
>
--
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-20 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-22 17:36 [PATCH v3] perf record: add dummy event during system wide synthesis Ian Rogers
2020-04-23 12:03 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08 16:29 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-05-08 17:22 ` Ian Rogers
2020-05-20 1:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2020-05-20 5:59 ` Ian Rogers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200520015435.GB32678@kernel.org \
--to=arnaldo.melo@gmail.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).