From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D34C4338F for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39782601FC for ; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232851AbhHIQb0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:31:26 -0400 Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de ([195.135.220.28]:60688 "EHLO smtp-out1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232887AbhHIQbY (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Aug 2021 12:31:24 -0400 Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 54B8521EB5; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:31:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de [192.168.254.74]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-521) server-digest SHA512) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7199C13AC8; Mon, 9 Aug 2021 16:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([192.168.254.65]) by imap2.suse-dmz.suse.de with ESMTPSA id +4SvC0VYEWEbTwAAMHmgww (envelope-from ); Mon, 09 Aug 2021 16:31:01 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2021 09:30:57 -0700 From: Davidlohr Bueso To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/7] perf/bench-futex: Factor out futex_flag Message-ID: <20210809163057.no4icet42g6vu6uo@offworld> References: <20210809043301.66002-1-dave@stgolabs.net> <20210809043301.66002-4-dave@stgolabs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20201120 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 09 Aug 2021, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: >Wouldn't be better to have it defined in one place and then in futex.h >just have a 'extern int futex_flag;' declaration? Sure. > >I applied the first two patches already. Ok so I'm clear, this one just won't get picked up right now then. (you don't want me to respin this patch then in a form v3, right?) Thanks, Davidlohr