linux-perf-users.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
To: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@redhat.com
Cc: michael@ellerman.id.au, eranian@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com,
	namhyung@kernel.org, kjain@linux.ibm.com,
	atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] tools/perf: Add bitfield_swap to handle branch_stack endian issue
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2021 18:20:58 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211016125059.691856-1-maddy@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

branch_stack struct has bit field definition which
produces different bit ordering for big/little endian.
Because of this, when branch_stack sample is collected
in a BE system and viewed/reported in a LE system, bit
fields of the branch stack are not presented properly.
To address this issue, a evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_stack()
is defined and introduced in evsel__parse_sample.

Signed-off-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
---
Changelog v1:
- Renamed function and macro
- Added comments in code

 tools/perf/util/evsel.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 tools/perf/util/evsel.h | 13 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
index dbfeceb2546c..746e642d4d32 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
@@ -2221,6 +2221,51 @@ void __weak arch_perf_parse_sample_weight(struct perf_sample *data,
 	data->weight = *array;
 }
 
+u64 evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(u64 value)
+{
+	u64 new_val = 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * branch_flags
+	 * union {
+	 * 	u64 values;
+	 * 	struct {
+	 * 		mispred:1	//target mispredicted
+	 * 		predicted:1	//target predicted
+	 * 		in_tx:1		//in transaction
+	 * 		abort:1		//transaction abort
+	 * 		cycles:16	//cycle count to last branch
+	 * 		type:4		//branch type
+	 * 		reserved:40
+	 * 	}
+	 * }
+	 *
+	 * Avoid bswap64() the entire branch_flag.value,
+	 * as it has variable bit-field sizes. Instead the
+	 * macro takes the bit-field position/size,
+	 * swaps it based on the host endianness.
+	 */
+	if (bigendian()) {
+		new_val = bitfield_swap(value, 0, 1);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 1, 1);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 2, 1);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 3, 1);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 4, 16);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 20, 4);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 24, 40);
+	} else {
+		new_val = bitfield_swap(value, 63, 1);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 62, 1);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 61, 1);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 60, 1);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 44, 16);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 40, 4);
+		new_val |= bitfield_swap(value, 0, 40);
+	}
+
+	return new_val;
+}
+
 int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
 			struct perf_sample *data)
 {
@@ -2408,6 +2453,8 @@ int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
 	if (type & PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_STACK) {
 		const u64 max_branch_nr = UINT64_MAX /
 					  sizeof(struct branch_entry);
+		struct branch_entry *e;
+		unsigned int i;
 
 		OVERFLOW_CHECK_u64(array);
 		data->branch_stack = (struct branch_stack *)array++;
@@ -2416,10 +2463,33 @@ int evsel__parse_sample(struct evsel *evsel, union perf_event *event,
 			return -EFAULT;
 
 		sz = data->branch_stack->nr * sizeof(struct branch_entry);
-		if (evsel__has_branch_hw_idx(evsel))
+		if (evsel__has_branch_hw_idx(evsel)) {
 			sz += sizeof(u64);
-		else
+			e = &data->branch_stack->entries[0];
+		} else {
 			data->no_hw_idx = true;
+			/*
+			 * if the PERF_SAMPLE_BRANCH_HW_INDEX is not applied,
+			 * only nr and entries[] will be output by kernel.
+			 */
+			e = (struct branch_entry *)&data->branch_stack->hw_idx;
+		}
+
+		if (swapped) {
+			/*
+			 * struct branch_flag does not have endian
+			 * specific bit field definition. And bswap
+			 * will not resolve the issue, since these
+			 * are bit fields.
+			 *
+			 * evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags() uses a
+			 * bitfield_swap macro to swap the bit position
+			 * based on the host endians.
+			 */
+			for (i = 0; i < data->branch_stack->nr; i++, e++)
+				e->flags.value = evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(e->flags.value);
+		}
+
 		OVERFLOW_CHECK(array, sz, max_size);
 		array = (void *)array + sz;
 	}
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
index 1f7edfa8568a..2e82cdbe2c08 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.h
@@ -482,4 +482,17 @@ struct evsel *evsel__leader(struct evsel *evsel);
 bool evsel__has_leader(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *leader);
 bool evsel__is_leader(struct evsel *evsel);
 void evsel__set_leader(struct evsel *evsel, struct evsel *leader);
+
+/*
+ * Macro to swap the bit-field postition and size.
+ * Used when,
+ * - dont need to swap the entire u64 &&
+ * - when u64 has variable bit-field sizes &&
+ * - when presented in a host endian which is different
+ *   than the source endian of the perf.data file
+ */
+#define bitfield_swap(src, pos, size)	\
+	((((src) >> (pos)) & ((1ull << (size)) - 1)) << (63 - ((pos) + (size) - 1)))
+
+u64 evsel__bitfield_swap_branch_flags(u64 value);
 #endif /* __PERF_EVSEL_H */
-- 
2.31.1


             reply	other threads:[~2021-10-16 12:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-10-16 12:50 Madhavan Srinivasan [this message]
2021-10-16 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tools/perf/test: Add endian test for struct branch_flags Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-21 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] tools/perf: Add bitfield_swap to handle branch_stack endian issue Jiri Olsa
2021-10-25 11:32   ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-25 12:07 ` Jiri Olsa
2021-10-28  0:09   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-28  0:16 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-28  2:37   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2021-10-28  4:30     ` Madhavan Srinivasan
2021-10-28  7:19     ` Madhavan Srinivasan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20211016125059.691856-1-maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=atrajeev@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=kjain@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=michael@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).